Why do pop history books and sites like Wikipedia write the phrase "Slavic subhuman" in quotation marks when it was never explicitely used by the Nazis?
>>1995835
but it was
>>1995838
That pamphlet doesn't contain the phrase "Slavic subhuman" though
>>1995844
"people" in the pamphlet are Slavs, they didn't need to fucking label it
>>1995835
Cause you are a nazi.
>>1995838
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0xb4crOvCgTRHNyYktoa19wdlk/edit
link to the pamphlet if anyone's interested.
>>1995835
Read Adolf's autistic book, it's all there.
>tfw argue with a nazi, turns out he haven't read mine kampf
>tfw argue with a commi, turns out he haven't read the capital
>tfw argue with religious fag, turns out he haven't read the bible
>Anime posting neo-nazis
Is this the ultimate incarnation of autism?
>>1995955
>It's rather about the peoples of the Soviet Union
Here, let me put it in a way you can understand
"The soviet union's demographic was composed mainly of Sl_vs"
come on, you can do it
>>1995969
>"The soviet union's demographic was composed mainly of Sl_vs"
And a large number of Slavs lived outside the Soviet Union
>come on, you can do it
you don't even understand what this thread is about and think you can act condescending lol
>>1995955
>go and find info for me because I'm lazy
No retard, go and read the book of your leader, than return.
>>1995852
>"people" in the pamphlet are Slavs
Proof?
They look like Brits
>>1996058
You claimed that Mein Kampf contains the phrase "Slavic subhuman" and now I'm obliged to confirm your claim?
>>1996090
>You claimed that Mein Kampf contains the phrase "Slavic subhuman" and now I'm obliged to confirm your claim?
A typical request from a /his/ /leftypol/.
>>1995835
The book creators wanted to call slavs subhuman but could hardly leave the quotations out.
>>1996306
The burden of proof is on you retard, you can't make a claim and then say "LMAO prove me wrong, I don't need to do the work to substantiate my positon!1"
>>1995838
that guy ironically looks german