Why is /his/ a neoreactionary board? Does learn about history makes you a nationalist autistic pro-monarchist knight? Disgusting, at least /pol/ is conservative, not reactionary
>>1987307
At this point, I think /his/ has been accused of representing every different political viewpoint under the sun.
>>1987307
Some people (especially social outcasts and the disenfranchised) love the idea of a unifying cause and a strong leader to make everything right, regardless of whether or not it actually goes down how they envision it.
>>1987307
You're giving too much credence to a vocal minority who took a dank meme too far.
>>1987307
His is an anarcho-monarchistic board
>>1987413
This.
> Not being anarcho-monarchist
It is like you aren't want to be crusader pilled or something.
>>1987307
Its weird, because I've found /his/ at lot more liberal than most boards. Every time Nazis or monarchists come up they get btfo.
>>1987307
>/pol/ isn't reactionary
A good portion of the board is dedicated towards shitposting about SJW's and the regressive left, the fuck are you talking about.
>>1987430
>/pol/
>reactionary
maybe some months ago
>>1987469
How is /pol/ any different now than it was a few months ago at the height of Trump's campaign.
>>1987307
/his/, objectively, is generally holds to a Rousseauian, Post-Phenomenological, Sarte-esque Cynicism, enacted via Pragmatic Leninism, aiming at the creation of an anarcho-technocratic global authorizing system for the purpose of Transhuman development and the Anti-Colonial expansion of Christianity throughout the galaxy.
I know some retards and autismos will disagree with this, but it was most of us believe.
>>1987307
I'm not a neorectionary. But sometimes I do argue for things that are decisively reactionary.
>>1987480
Trump campaign ironically neutralized /pol/
>>1987487
>yfw this describes you perfectly
>>1987499
Makes sense. Now /Pol/ will be pro gov, pro stablishmentOHMYGOD
What's going on ????
>>1987307
>Why is /his/ a neoreactionary board?
It's not, neo-reactionaries are a fucking joke on /his/. I've literally never seen a neo-reactionary here.
>Does learn about history makes you a nationalist autistic pro-monarchist knight?
No you faggot
>Disgusting, at least /pol/ is conservative, not reactionary
/pol/ is neither.
>>1987345
I've never seen us being called greens so there's that.
>>1988610
I don't go on /pol/ but /int/ has already turned pretty anti-Trump. He lasted like one day after the election
>>1988625
In a bizarre way, makes sense.
I'll check that just to be amazed
>>1987307
/his/ is one of the least educated boards on 4chan. It's visited by people who "like" history rather than people who "know" about history. It's the equivalent of /sci/ but with a lower average IQ.
>>1987307
Off yourself