>there are people /his/ RIGHT NOW who legitimately think the

go to bed /pol/ sage and reported

File: 1231.jpg (628KB, 2337x3372px) Image search: [Google]

628KB, 2337x3372px

>>19651
>mfw i get to drive by his house almost everyday

>>19722
>discussion about the american civil war is not history

You're fucking retarded.

tfw OP is a faggot

File: 1446356538608.png (6KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 300x300px

>>19651
The South attacked the North first.

>>19761
>there are people who think the niggers weren't better off as slaves

sage and reported

File: northern.jpg (205KB, 980x748px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 980x748px

>implying the great civilizing mission to the South wasn't necessary

I just wish Sherman had force bred all the secessionist fucks with the former slaves, we'd have tackled the future Jim Crow along with slavery.

>>19651

you got ur boipussy pushed wide open hillbilly fuck :^)

>>19830
kek

>>19758
That's some fucking sweet hair, Abe

>>19651
Reported.

File: interview11.jpg (241KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 800x533px

>>19651
>there are people /his/ RIGHT NOW who legitimately think the south didn't have the right to secede
they had just as much of a right to seceed as the 13 colonies did, the north had just as much of a right to try and stop the south from breaking away as the british did the 13 colonies

>there are a people who legitimately support a war of northern aggression, the murder of thousands of innocent civilians and destruction of property
wars are ugly things, they should never be started lightly

>there are people who are accepting of the deaths of 620,000 soldiers
yes people die in war, that is certainly true

>there are people who think the niggers weren't better off as slaves
me for isntance

also sage

File: .png (75KB, 919x737px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 919x737px

>>19832
perhaps a more gradual change at the South's own pace would have lead to less strife

We're discussing history not some deluded nonsense about racial superiority

>>20008
That commented sealed the fact that this is a bait thread and you have nothing of worth to contribute to any discussion. Sage

Those people would be nationalist yank scum. The world would have been better off had the South remained independent.

>>19651
Sage and report.

Reported for going against the liberal hivemind /pol/ bigot

>>19832
620,000 American lives to control a part of the country that disagrees with everything the other part does. But that doesn't matter, the north has way more population...

>>20008
if the south wanted that then perhaps they shouldn't have gone to war to prevent it

>>20144
pretty much this.

>>20171
Their population was of european refugees who were just wage slaves

>>20214
Is arguing for the rights to own slaves really going against the 'liberal hivemind'? Kek.

>>19651
MODS
O
D
S

>>20291
It's certainly on-topic of this board, at any rate.

>>20178
This.

"Gradual evolution of the South's economy" was what everyone outside the south wanted. It was what the slaveholding class feared, hated and started a war over.

It's why they constantly sought to expand the economic domination of the slave economy, into new territories, and looked to conquer elsewhere including Nicaragua and Cuba, to keep the system going.

If you sympathize with the South, you have no grounds to hate the Warsaw pact.

Honestly as a Northerner I just wished we would have deported the niggers back to Africa after the war ended.

>>20345
it was what lincoln wanted, thanks for murdering him south

great job yet again