>The Romans were a bunch of gay war-mongers
How true is this statement?
They were warmongerers but not so much gay.
they needed contraception and the closest to that is fucking a slave
>>1964808
Not as much as Spartans. They were the bigest mistake. Just some pedo-homo obssesed primitives without culture. Greeks at least tried to control they dick and hungry for boy puss.
>>1964808
>How true is this statement?
Pretty true about every civ.
>The Egyptians were a bunch of gay war-mongers
>The Greeks were a bunch of gay war-mongers
>The Persians were a bunch of gay war-mongers
>The Arabs were a bunch of gay war-mongers
>The Turks were a bunch of straight war-mongers
>The Crusaders were a bunch of gay war-mongers
>The Americans are a bunch of gay war-mongers
>The Europeans are a bunch of gays
>>1964808
>>1964829
Wrong. In Egypt gay love was not prased like in Greece and pederastia was rather shameful.
Crusaders are not a civilzation...they were european knights who burn gays.
The same with Americans and European, The pro-gay move is XXIc thing. (less then 20 years)
>>1964829
pretty sure Egyptians and Persians never practiced homosex
>>1964829
In PErsia homo and pedo is a thing after fucking faggot Alaexander tainted glorious Persian Empire with degeneracy. All that a pedo-homo greek touches turns to shit, same with rome.
>>1964829
aghagh yes very straight
(not really turks are all about the boi pussy i swear))
>>1964829
I als got this
You can't really call the Greco-Roman world "gay" because the term never existed in that era.
Sex was just sex, regardless of whether it was with slave boys, women, or dudes. They engaged in homosexual activity, but you couldn't really call them gay because at the time they just fucked whoever they wanted.