Would something like this constitute rape?
This is on topic because it's a humanities question.
>>1935562
legal theory doesn't constitute humanities you fucking retard
>>1935562
depends on how we consider any other "im in a band", "im friends with the DJ", etc. pickup lie.
>>1935570
Rape isn't an inherently legal thing, it's a moral thing too.
>>1935562
Are British women just incapable of facial recognition or something? This guy isn't a total lookalike of James May.
>>1935562
He looks nothing like May. They must have been pretty dumb.
>>1935579
>women who want to have sex with a Top Gear presenter aren't the brightest
who'd have thought?
Unless the women specifically said 'I'm about to have sex with you because you are James May', no, even though it's obviously the case, the law is powerless, and vapid cunts deserve it anyway, in parts for having such shit taste in men
>>1935593
You mean women who would have sex with a Top Gear presenter that isn't Hammond.
Hammond is still a handsome motherfucker to this day.
>>1935604
He looks like low-test Hugh Jackman
>>1935617
Excuse you, did you look at him in the OP pic? The black hair and goatee are GOAT
>>1935562
As a precedent, some Israeli woman successfully sued a married Arab dude for rape because he pretended to be Jewish and single when they were courting.
I mean, I get that she was angry because he only wanted a one-night stand and she was looking for a marriage partner but that's a fairly common story when you're speed-dating.
>>1935562
Only if those 500 were James May wives/lovers. Otherwise its just PUA tactics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_deception