All concepts de-facto exist. Objective morality is real. God

They exist in action.

>>1935499
>concepts are real if you treat them as such
duh

>Objective morality is real
I dont understand why people doubt this.
Natural selection will always favour those who works as a collective over edgy immoral faggots, sophisticated societies are simply bound to have a strong moral core

>>1935519
1. That's wrong
2. Naturally selected for =/= morally good

>>1935519
Incorrect

Natural selection works on an individual level, not species wide

Selfish immoralists always triumph over moralists so immorality is selected for

File: 1779.jpg (20KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x306px

>>1935535
>Natural selection works on an individual level, not species wide

>All concepts de-facto exist.

Okay, let's accept this

>Objective morality is real. God is real. Purpose in life is real.

Does that make objective lack of morality, the Godslayer, and lack of purpose in life also real?

File: 1477911950627.jpg (6KB, 200x195px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x195px

>>1935499
>unicorns are real
>Zeus is real
>your capacity for normal social interaction is real

>all concepts de-facto exist

Including the concept that that is false?

>>1935549
If they aren't real, how are we discussing them right now? Intellectual checkmate.

File: 5platonic.jpg (19KB, 435x405px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 435x405px

>>1935595
Yes, learn to forms, faggot

>>1935519
Literally the naturalistic fallacy.

Predation and parasitism are also highly successful strategies among thousands of species. Even amongst humans the men who spread their seed the most were kings who could murder and rape their way across the land (e.g. Ghengis Khan).

The fact a strategy is successful is not indicative of objective morality. Only that it's useful for achieving certain ends.