I've noticed that modern depictions of King George III tend

>>1933646
>Didn't he defeat Napoleon?

Lmao

1.Britain played a minot role in Napoleon's defeat
2. The King barely had any power left in Britain at that time

File: Barbara Villiers.jpg (379KB, 814x1024px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 814x1024px

>>1933646
the king suffered periodically from the hereditary metabolic disease called porphyria, though not until he had already been on the throne for more than a quarter of a century.

>>1933646

I mean, just fucking look at him.

He wasn't stupid. There was something physically wrong with him. I can't remember what exactly but it stayed with him for most of his life. In his moments of clarity he was hard-working and seen as quite diligent.

>>1933657
>falling for the bait this hard
Frogs cannae help themselves

>>1933689
He looks like a classy geezer.

>>1933646
>Why is this?

Because he lost the colonies. He was actually well regarded in his day.

>>1933704
Colonists thought he was retarded, though. And that was when they were still colonists.