>Descartes argued that anime's existence can be deduced from its nature, just as geometric ideas can be deduced from the nature of shapes—he used the deduction of the sizes of angles in a triangle as an example. He suggested that the concept of anime is that of a supremely perfect show, holding all perfections. He seems to have assumed that existence is a predicate of a perfection. Thus, if the notion of anime did not include existence, it would not be supremely perfect, as it would be lacking a perfection. Consequently, the notion of a supremely perfect anime that does not exist, Descartes argues, is unintelligible. Therefore, according to its nature, anime must exist.
>>1929600
haha yes! thank you! my whole household revolves around anime! I'll be putting that one up in the kitchen where we eat breakfast!
il also be posting it on reddit
>>1929600
What's your point? Everyone knows Descartes's argument for the existence of God is bullshit. The reason he's still taught and is often used as an intro to psychology is because he was one of the early enlightenment philosophers and his method was an important contribution to philosophy. But any professor worth their salt will be sure to tell you why some of his arguments are flawed, and even introduce those who countered his arguments.
>>1929600
Anime waifus being real have already been argued for, and in my opinion much more successfully, in this paper
http://philpapers.org/archive/SINPG
>>1930660
>The reason he's still taught and is often used as an intro to psychology
Sure you don't mean philosophy?
>>1930668
Yeah I meant philosophy, woops.