>make a huge mess
>clean it up
>pretend you accomplished something
This is what humanity has been doing for millenia. The entire history of human endeavour has been a long tedious process of self-abuse. Why are breeders and life-apologists so retarded that they think this is acceptable?
First you should tell us what the fuck your talking about.
Did you forget to take your meds today?
>>1925347
Humanity just solves problems that it creates for itself. its like a teenage girl, shit-testing itself.
>>1925356
Alright, what would you propose we do about those problems? And what problems are you talking about, specifically?
>>1925356
it also solves problems that it doesn't create for itself, those are most of the problems it solves
>>1925362
>>1925360
>impling creating need machines (more humans) isn't the ultimate problem it creates
Natalism vs. antinatalism.
It is hilarious how the natalists try to argue with the antinatalists, the latter of whom are like an enemy in the middle of war threatening to commit suicide. It's not just the antinatalists who shouldn't reproduce, then, but even many of the natalists, such as for instance all those who try to argue with the antinatalists.
It is never an issue of being "for" or "against" war. For even those who are "against" it have to wage it in order to put an "end" to it! Only a complete idiot would think that war is a problem! One acts here as one acts in a basketball match: one picks a side and plays the game. The game itself is not a "problem" — the game is the whole point!
>mfw industrial hypercapitalist petro-civilization is literally about producing as much garbage as physically possible
>>1925401
Not only that but OP's picture shows even more inconsistency: obviously he considers atomic bombing abhorrent, yet even by his own degenerate values it *saved more lives* than it took
>>1925401
I am not talking about war. The atom bomb was just a representation of the deficit of utility which humanity create for itself only to pat itself on the back when it has mitigated the damage.
>>1925423
In a million years all the garbage be around to matter.
>>1925426
I consider atomic bombing abhorrent because its certainly not done in "good faith". But at any rate it causes unspeakable suffering, severe burns, genetic mutations, apocalyptic living conditions. The truly fortunate are those in the immediate blast radius who vaporize immediately.
>>1925449
How the fuck would it be done in good faith idiot?
>muh planet earth we should all stop reproducing
Ever notice antinatalists are disgusting specimens no one wants to reproduce with anyway?
>>1925522
Their problem(as with a vast majority of peoples "problems") generally start with themselves.
>>1925522
it's not surprising. antinatalism stems from viewing life as an inherent negative and thus not worth living, and the antinatalist usually comes to this conclusion about their own life before extrapolating it onto the rest of humanity.
Has there ever been a purer form of slave morality than antinatalism?
>>1925401
>tu quoque
I'm not an antinatalist but come on dude, that's just lame.
>>1925558
Should it matter? Even to the antinatalist?
>this actually happened to people just because they were born
>>1925340
Yeah let's just ignore all the technological progress humanity has made in favor of sweeping generalizations that make you feel like an enlightened individual.
>>1926838
exactly! :^)
>>1926780
What a shitty fucking way to die
>>1925485
>how can nuclear energy be used in good faith?
Come now anon, you should feel silly
>>1926780
please.
whoever ended up suffering through that shit 100% deserved it.
>>1929363
Some probably, but what about the thousands of children that were ritualistically killed in that thing?
>>1925558
christianity