What am i /his/? I agree with the points of monarchist traditionalism,

>>1874822
Alt-right, reactionary

>>1874826
I absolutely detest the so called “alt-right”.
I can't be a reactionary since fascism and futurism are revolutionary while reactionaries are opposed to revolutionary ideologies.

>>1874845
But couldn't fascism just be considered a reaction to the general liberalization of the west?

File: fashy12.jpg (47KB, 650x406px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 650x406px

>>1874863
Well, in my opinion no.
Monarchism/Traditionalism is the only reactionary movement of today.
Fascism is a revolutionary ideology, it doesn't seek to rebuild the old European society.
It seeks to create a completely new society based on the "cosmic order".

>>1874822
what the hell is this pic anyway
this is the most ineffective propaganda I have ever sen, and that's from somebody who's ideologically sympathetic to it

>>1874845
why do you detest the alt-right?

File: tumblr_obz8r5d17R1uaxri9o1_1280.jpg (342KB, 1280x837px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1280x837px

>>1875424

omniphi is rather hit or miss

as for the op, I'd just peg you as a radical traditionalist.

File: spooked.png (708B, 153x173px) Image search: [Google]

708B, 153x173px

>What am i /his/?

Stop labeling yourself. It's a waste of time that could be spent learning something new.

>>1874822

>you fucking guys....

thanks for making me laugh

>>1874822

You're a snowflake.

Incoherent

>>1874845
The alt-right isn't a explicitly defined ideology yet. There is everything from ancap to Christian monarchists to national socialists in it. If you are a philosopher or aspiring philosopher now is the time to get your ideas out and try to influence the movement.

>>1876119
Yes, I am, I just can't get dismiss any of the points that speak to me from those ideologies even if they are contradictory.

>>1876359
No, alt-right is pretty clearly defined as people who would suck Milo's dick.

>>1874822
Retarded.