How the hell did he fuck up so badly? All he had to do was not

We've been through this a hundred times, Hans. Hitler wanted war, the British would've declared it on him no matter what. Now go jerk off to images of Pickelhauben.

>>1874423
>Implying he wouldn't have settled for all of Europe.

>>1874516

Sorry, Oswald. This just keeps me up at night all the time.

He doomed Germany to remain a shell of it's former self and he got the Volksdeutsche ethically cleansed and raped.

>>1874423
the war destroyed europe and we have the eternal anglo's autism to thank

>>1874736

What's up with Germans and Germanaboos managing to blame literally anybody but themselves?

You're like children. You throw your toys out of the cot because you didn't get as much as you wanted, you scream and cry, ruin it for everyone, then have the nerve to say it's everyone else's fault.

>>1874763
i'm not sad about it, expecting anything else from the eternal anglo is foolish

i'm just amused that the anglos managed to pick the one option that destroyed their empire forever and made them and their fellow europeans an irrelevance on the world stage

>>1874640
>ethically cleansed.
Nice Freudian slip, stormfag.

>>1874763
WW2 really couldn't have ended any other way
If Germany wasn't stomped into the ground then they'd just come back 10 years later insisting that they were never really beaten and they'll totally win this time.

>>1874423

How inept at german history are you?

Question, without the invasion of Czechoslovakia and Poland, how would he have paid off Germany's debts?

>>1874789
>>1874789
how did they with?

>>1874778

Yeah, because the Germans didn't have any choice did they? The eternal Anglo really forced their hand on that whole "marching through Belgium" thing and again on the whole "invading Poland thing."

Consider, anonymous, that in both wars Britain was very clear: "Look, we gave these people our word that we'd come and help them, we'd prefer it if you didn't invade." to which Germany goes "eh they won't do it." and invade anyway. In the first war Germany was ALSO A SIGNATORY of the SAME TREATY that guaranteed Belgium's neutrality.

You krauts really do have some crazy cognitive dissonance.

>>1874789
>how would he have paid off Germany's debts?

He wasn't doing that anyway. You do realize "fuck versailles" was a big element of his platform, don't you?

>>1874827

Not talking about those debts. I'm talkinga about the massive debts he funded the armaments industry with.

>>1874423
Shitty German economy. They almost bankrupted themselves and most of those jobs they created were in war industry. So Hitler needed to start wars to keep those companies running and needed to invade countries to steel their currency and gold reservers so Germany won't go bankrupt.

Of course Hitler and his pals set up the German economy like that in the first place. He was preparing for war since 1934.

>>1874824
that's not the point i'm making

the point is that starting the war was a dumb decision for everyone in europe

>>1874423
It's a good thing Shitler lost you fucking Wehraboo neckbeard.

>>1874793

By taking over the governments and liquidating the private citizens they owed money to.

Reminder that up until March 1939, the powers that be in Britain wanted a strong Germany to protect Central/Eastern Europe from the USSR, and had spent 20 years encouraging lenience towards Germany and addressing their grievances.

Hitler literally ruined everything.

>>1874871

You're making a pretty fucking clear indication of where you're placing blame when you say "we have the eternal anglo's autism to thank" as if it wasn't pretty fucking clear what was going to happen if Germany did the EXACT THING Britain TOLD THEM not to do because IF THEY DID Britain would have to DECLARE WAR.

Which side is autistic in that case? Where is the breakdown in communication in "We've guaranteed the neutrality and independence of Belgium/Poland so if you invade we'll be at war so please don't invade them thanks."

fascism (even with Hitler's weird socialist version of it) pretty much requires you to do 2 major important things

1. rev up your economy by getting it ready for war, and try to get as close to full employment as possible
2. take over as much as shit as possible, and exploit defeated country's resources for the mainland

Hitler HAD to go to war. There was no way to avoid it. The German economy was only strong because it was ready for war, not because he's some genius economist or something. Germany has always had the geographic disadvantage of being in the dead center of Europe

>>1874900
Adding to this, with the exception of Danzig, the areas that Germany had lost to Poland in 1919-1922 were full of Poles who had violently revolted against German rule and had no desire to return to it.

Furthermore, the "Sudeten Germans" in Czechoslovakia were the descendants of settlers who had been invited by the King to settle the historic borderlands of Bohemia (which doubled as a natural fortification).

>>1874903
> it wasn't pretty fucking clear what was going to happen if Germany did the EXACT THING Britain TOLD THEM not to do because IF THEY DID Britain would have to DECLARE WAR.
it wasn't pretty fucking clear because declaring war was a retarded thing to do for britain

autistically doing something that will obviously hurt you is the definition of autism

>>1874871
Hitler had to go to war because he's a retarded fascist

there was no way for the German economy to work (or any economy for that matter) under fascism without warmongering. Like the other anon pointed out, he had to pay back the debts he racked up to reinvigorate his economy by doing what fascists do: invading other countries and exploiting their resources for the mainland

>>1874516
>the British would've declared it on him no matter what

I agree with this. I think Churchill would have continuously argued for war with the Germans no matter what they did, after the initial break of the treaty.

Churchill got rekt by the Germans and Ottomans in World War 1. He couldn't find a way to destroy them. He was determined to get a second chance in order to prove his might against them.

>>1874778
>implying Hitler wouldn't have turned on them eventually

Except later down the track, after taking massive amounts of territory and making insane technological improvements, Britain and her allies would have stood no chance.

Losing the Empire was a worthy sacrifice to save liberty around the world. It's the US's brainwashed fault that the Empire broke up anyway.

>>1874932

>autistically doing something that will obviously hurt you is the definition of autism

First, no it isn't, you fucking jackass. That's your imaginary definition of autism that you came up with to try and shoehorn Britain into it. Masochism is the word you're looking for, and that has nothing to do with autism.

Second, your word is worth as much as the actions that support it. If Britain had let Germany bully their allies and backed like cowards in the face of overt German aggression then any future guarantees they made wouldn't be worth the paper they were written on. Germany, especially in the second world war, had already proven that just balking at their unreasonable demands didn't make them less aggressive. In the first world war jackass decisions like Flottenpolitik had directly alienated and threatened Britain. Perhaps the world wars ruined Britain, but the alternative was kicking the can down the road and letting the hun accumulate more power with the very obvious willingness to use it against Britain, her allies, and her geopolitical goals (building up a fleet to challenge the royal navy sends a pretty distinct message in this regard).

If anything the Germans were the autists - if they didn't want Britain against them, they would have
A) Not threatened Britain with constant warmongering rhetoric and a naval arms race
B) Not invaded their fucking friends counting on the British to balk.

>>1874423
hitler couldn't have won without czech tanks

>>1874975
anglo autism: the post

>>1875074
>I got blown the fuck out but I'll just use my "autism" meme word instead of an actual response, that'll show him

>>1874786

Fucking Anglo autocorrect

>>1875074
>16 year old edgy national socialist btfo

>>1875087
> the alternative was kicking the can down the road and letting the hun accumulate more power with the very obvious willingness to use it against Britain, her allies, and her geopolitical goals (building up a fleet to challenge the royal navy sends a pretty distinct message in this regard).
OH NO A POTENTIAL CHALLENGE TO MY GEOPOLITICAL GOALS IN THE FUTURE THAT MIGHT RUIN ME OR A WAR RIGHT NOW THAT WILL RUIN ME

WHICH ONE WILL I, THE ETERNAL ANGLO, CHOOSE??

this is why arguing with anglos is pointless

He was wildly successful. Not according to his aims, but in saving Europe.

If Germany hadn't taken the fight to Stalin in 1941, I have no doubt that all of Europe would have fallen instead of merely half.

>>1875166
[invades a neutral country]

Go away Kaiserboo. Better yet, just fucking neck yourself you little scrub.

File: 1475233948070.jpg (19KB, 253x235px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 253x235px

>>1874778
>>1874736
Or you know, Germany could have not started the fucking war in the first place?

>>1874956
This kind of statement is strange, essentially without the invasion and annexation of the Slavic regions of Czechoslovakia there would have been minimal cause to pursue war solely on Churchill's part. I would admit that the rhetoric of the Nazi party surely would not allow the country to withstand a long period of peace. The continuing issues of Alsace-Lorraine and the Danzig corridor among others would surely have still caused a war at some point

File: 1472684600959.gif (3MB, 286x258px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 286x258px

>>1875074
you're pathetic

>>1875166
>this is why arguing with anglos is pointless
Are you even listening to yourself?