Can anybody actually name one thing wrong with shariah law? From a historical standpoint it's been the most successful law system in history
Western law systems go through change after change, revision after revision, amendment after amendment and it's a fucking mess. France gets a new fucking constitution every 30 years.
Meanwhile, shariah law is shariah law, and it seems to work.
>>1870972
The societies where sharia law is applied dont seem so happy. Iran for example is quite high on the misery index and the people are getting more and more jaded of religion. There is also a growing civic resistance. Even in saudi arabia people start to get pissy
>>1870972
>Meanwhile, shariah law is shariah law, and it seems to work.
That's not exactly true, however. Shari'ah law as many envision it is something like Bushido - something masquerading as a tradition older than it really is and interpreted in ways neither intended nor practicable at the time.
Shari'ah was less a system and more what a generation of political idealists and opportunists began to call a mishmash of legal traditions newly reinterpreted to conform to revivalist religious trends. So its what's wrong wrong with it, among others, is that it declares itself to be legally and morally supreme with only the weight of a short-lived manufactured tradition behind it, which is why it's having all sorts of problems of abuse in rapidly changing modern societies.
Random ass clerics frequently make up new rules or bend/break old ones. In some Muslim countries they will put you to the sword for using opium while it's okay in others.
Go look at the countries employing sharia law and tell me they are the most successful ones in history.
2/10
It's ironic that Mohamed's first wife had more rights in Mohamed's day than she would in modern day Saudi Arabia.
>muh equality
>muh freedoms
>>1870972
>Based on lies
That was simple.