Is Arabic basically Hebrew in cursive form? Also is there a

>>1845113


First off Aramaic != Arabic.

Secondly, there is a cursive script for Hebrew.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cursive_Hebrew

It looks very little like Arabic script.

>>1845113
>>1845223
None of those are arabic

File: Cursive Hebrew.png (22KB, 700x206px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 700x206px

>>1845113
There is a cursive script for hebrew that's used for handwriting the same way some letters in arabic look different when you handwrite them (like say ه or لا for instance)
Although the cursive script in Hebrew is a medieval invention if memory serves me right so it doesn't really look that much more similar

As for this
>Is Arabic basically Hebrew in cursive form?
Not really although the script that Hebrew uses right now is technically the ancestor to arabic through the nabatic script since the Hebrew script that's used today is the old Aramaic. The original Hebrew script was basically the Phoenician script which in itself is similar to all of these since the Aramaic script evolved from it. You'll find similarities in it as well to the other scripts.

>>1845223
>First off Aramaic != Arabic.

Aramaic is closer to Hebrew than Arabic and it's still neither of those.

trasliteration of the lord's prayer (up until "Thy kingdom come") in Arabic:
Abā-nā ‘alladhī fī as-samāwāt,
li-ya-ta-qaddas-i asm-u-ka
li-ya-’ti malakūt-u-ka

trasliteration of the lord's prayer in Aramaic:

Abwoon d'bashmaya
Netqaddash shmak
Teete malkutah

trasliteration of the lord's prayer in Hebrew:

Avino she-ba-shamayim
yitqadesh shimkhaa
tawo malkhutekha

>>1845394
So Hebrew is just Aramaic in block form.

And Aramaic is Hebrew in cursive form

I also heard the Hebrew that Jesus spoke was different from Biblical Hebrew. Hebrew at that time grew to have Aramaic influence apparently

>>1845113
Arabic is Hebrew written by a man with Parkinson's disease.

>>1845113
Arabic is not a Semetic language

File: 9Ul6ahE.jpg (45KB, 614x470px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 614x470px

>>1846123

File: hqdefault.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>1846110

>>1845904
No you retards they're all descended from imperial Aramaic.

>>1846373
hebrew and aramaic developed separately. hebrew just adapted the aramaic alphabet later on

File: alphabets.png (228KB, 1421x1627px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1421x1627px

It's not hard to understand. After the Phoenicians took some hieroglyphs and made and abjad out of them the people around them started to use it too, including the early Aramaeans, Hebrews, and Greeks. After the Achaemenids made Imperial Aramaic the official language, all the people in the regions under their control started to use it and write in its script. When the Achaemenids fell, Greek replaced Imperial Aramaic as the administrative language and the various regional dialects diverged even further including their scripts and spelling although dialectal differences probably already existed during the Achaemenid period.
>>1845394
That transcription is based off Syriac which is an eastern Aramaic language. Yeshua spoke a dialect of Palestinian Aramaic. Steve Caruso has done some work in reconstructing the Our Father in Galilean Aramaic.
http://aramaicnt.org/articles/the-lords-prayer-in-galilean-aramaic/

>>1846719
>Based on Greek with Pahlavi and Syriac (read Semitic) influences.

>>1846785
>Steve Caruso has done some work in reconstructing the Our Father in Galilean Aramaic.
>reconstructing
it was orginally written in greek you dunce

>>1845904
>Jesus
>the Hebrew that he spoke
Fucking idiot, it's like you didn't read the thread (short as it was) at all.

>>1846719
Go slurp on a Armenian/Georgian squiggly digglie, faglord.

>>1845904
Hebrew was a dead language, only used in liturgy by the time Jesus was born. Aramaic was the everyday spoken language in Israel.

>>1846931

Not him, but that doesn't seem to be quite right.

For one thing, we have 1st century ossuary inscriptions in Hebrew. Not a lot, not nearly as many as Aramaic ones (or Greek ones), but they were around. Secondly, new religious writings were often done in Greek and Hebrew, for instance, the Mishnah was written in Hebrew, and that's not that far off from Jesus.

Was it a cradle language? No, but it wasn't completely dead either, and if Jesus was a Rabbi of some sort, he almost certainly knew Hebrew.

>>1846951
>Was it a cradle language? No, but it wasn't completely dead either
That's what a dead language is, one that doesn't have any native speakers.

>>1846961

It is my understanding that a dead language no longer has any common parlance speakers, whether or not it is their first or a second language. Gaelic, for instance, is not considered a dead language, despite nobody learning it before English in the places it is learned. That makes it distinct from say, Latin by the renaissance, as nobody was speaking Latin to conduct business at the marketplace.

Hebrew did still have non-liturgical use among the Hebrews in Palestine in the 1st century. You have, for instance, 1st century Hebrew graffiti.

>>1846853
>muh Greek primacy
What is the Gospel of the Hebrews or oral tradition for that matter?
Matthew 4:25
>And there followed him large multitudes from Galilee, and Decapolis, and Jerusalem, and Judaea, and across the Jordan.
All those regions were Aramaic speaking. There's also the internal evidence of Aramaisms throughout the gospels in the non narrative parts including in the Our Father prayer.

File: 300px-世-bronze.svg.png (7KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x300px

this ancient chinese symbol for 世 looks a lot like ש

>>1845113
Aramaic is not Arabic.

>>1847789
The Japanese hiragana ゆ looks a lot like the russian letter Ю and they even represent the same sound (transcripted into english as the "YU" as in Yuri), really makes you think doesn't it?

>>1845113
The Arabic script was derived from the form of writing Nabataean camel herders gave the Aramaic script. It initially didn't mark vowels. During the first centuries of Islam's spread a script called Kufic arose. It was big and bold as if signalizing the religion's success.