How would history have developed differently if Romania and Hungary

>>1832040
Not that much. The most slavs hate each other despite speacking a related language.

>>1832040

Not much. Language is not a barrier to cultural diffusion and culture of, let's say, Hungarians is very similar to that of Czechs or Slovaks.

Slavic languages aren't mutually intelligible by the way and Slavs have very little in common at this point aside from distantly related languages and some remnants of common traits in folk culture. Panslavism was just a meme of edgelords from bourgeois houses that evaporated the very moment said edgelords learnt what a shithole Russia is.

>>1832044
>>1832047
Good posts.

Also, Western Slavs very distant with Russkies and Yugoslavs.

>>1832052
Yup, because Western Slavs sucked a lot of German dick, Papist scum
>Serb, Defender of the Gates od Europa, reporting in

File: richest slav in all of ussr.jpg (31KB, 378x394px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 378x394px

>>1832040
>How would history have developed differently if Romania and Hungary would have become slavic, linguistically speaking?
They would be able to walk on two legs but otherwise pretty much be the same drunk gypsies and bozgors that squat now also.

>>1832201
>turkish scum
>thinks he can say shit like that and not get impaled

File: Radu bin Tepes.png (86KB, 220x313px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 220x313px

>>1832209

File: 1474128961471.jpg (106KB, 326x649px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 326x649px

>>1832195
Serbs are natural born slaves
>>1832249
fuck off pan-slavist retard.

>>1832259
And Turks are subhuman vermin that are only adept at sneaking into camps and burning men alive in their sleep.

>fuck off pan-Slavist retard.

You've got more in common with other Slavs than you'd like to admit, no modern-day revisionism and sense of self-loathing will change that.

>>1832044
It's historical rivalry, not hate.Depending on the group in question, feeling range from a sense of brotherhood to passive aggressive animosity.

>>1832047
> Slavic languages aren't mutually intelligible by the way

They are to some extent.

> and Slavs have very little in common at this point aside from distantly related languages and some remnants of common traits in folk culture

According to whom?

>Pan-Slavism was just a meme

Austrians, Hungarians and Germans have said the same during the time when it was the most active, and they've regretted it ever since.Side note, I'll keep existing as long as there is repression aimed at Slavs.

>>1832270
>According to whom?
According to anyone that knows anything about Western Slavs.

File: Most recent, average facial compositions of Slavic people..png (4MB, 2377x1903px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2377x1903px

>>1832278
I'd say the opposite.You suffer from the same plights as the rest of us do: innate stubbornness, obsession with honor and dignity, lack of pro-activeness on a national level, historically-backed victim complex, somewhat mutually intelligible language and very similar physiognomy