I don't know the posters name, but I feel it would be a

>>1793271
That was just an edgy shitpost. I don't buy into Fomenko's theories. They shouldn't be taken to seriously.
Still there may be a grain of truth in the fact that many things in history are based on little evidence and assumptions, and at some point we may talk about things that never actually happened.
That doesn't mean everything is fake.

If you want more examples of weird revisionism check this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG03BG5t6ps

>>1793364
"It's just bullshit trust me guys."

How Do We Know History Is Real If Our Brains Aren't Real.

Epistemology.

>>1793715
Fuck off.