Should true morality be concerned with suffering of an animals?

I honestly give 0 fucks if I get my humburger. They are going to die anyway, so unless the way of killing him can cause me something I'm okay with everything.

File: hitler-with-roe-deer.jpg (168KB, 1000x629px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1000x629px

>>1788188
Yes, animal welfare is good

>>1788213
> They are going to die anyway
So are we, anon.

>>1788188

Probably. The question is, how to prove it.

>>1788188
animals with bad quality of life make shitty food, so yes

>>1788188

>true morality

there is no such thing as objective morality unless you wanna go the "muh Bible, muh Quran" route

File: drekutu.jpg (36KB, 419x354px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 419x354px

>>1788188
>Isn't it our duty to fight for lowest organism rights and live with them in a harmony?
How do you live in harmony with k*rds?

How? People still die due starvation in 2016 and we give no fucks about it. There's no pity for our similars, what do you expect?

animal rights fanatics always tend to be very unpleasant and misanthropic people. why is that?

>>1788445
they form deep bonds with dumb animals because they failed to form meaningful bonds with other humans

>>1788188
>our duty
Says who?

I think so but lab grown meat will replace real meat for the most part eventually.

>>1788452
this is false
I have no meaningful bonds with humans and I hate animals
animal lovers are generally fairly well off socially,
the human mind that is over-active in looking for social ques will believe that an animal's expression has deeper meaning than it really does

>>1788452
nope, humans that are more sensitive to the feelings of others are more sensitive to the "''feelings'''' of animals

>>1788188
>true
>morality
>duty
>harmony