Has there ever been a society that based law on aesthetics rather

Economy and politics are both subjective and arbitrary enough, how could you conceive a system of law based on something as fleeting as "beauty"?

>>1778032
Contemporary western culture is the only one I can think of where beautiful people get off with lighter sentences or warnings.

>>1778043
Really?

>>1778043
that's not beautiful, that's ugly. your concept of aesthetics is pretty simplistic and underdeveloped.
>>1778042
obviously you'd have to make an electoral system and make an almost religious effort to establish a cultural notion of aesthetics. you'd then educate censors that could decide who had the right sense of beauty to be judges.

File: Zoolander-2-ya-ha-batido-un-record_reference.jpg (58KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x600px

Give me your fit, your tanned,
Your fashionable masses yearning to catwalk,
The cutie pies of your teeming shore.
Send these, the blonde, blue-eyed to me,
I lift my iPhone beside the golden door!

>>1778032
Rome

>>1778056
>>1778054
please don't make it a trend in this thread to mistakenly think that aesthetics or beauty means physical attractiveness.

>>1778060
oops meant to reply to >>1778043
not >>1778054

>>1778050
Look at almost any hollywood stars trials. Especially actresses get away with almost anything shy of actual undeniable premeditated murder.

>>1778074
that's the zionist influence, not the face of an actor

>>1778060
Same thing, aesthetics is just a fancier name for it.

>>1778060
>mistakenly think that aesthetics or beauty means physical attractiveness.

Why not? How can you judge by the aesthetics of fraud, theft or murder? No ofcourse no such society has ever existed. Only a post-modernist could even come up with an idea as absurd as that..

>>1778074
Probably because they're buying the judges off?

>>1778093
So you frequently want to fuck a majestic landscape or a newborn baby? the notions of liberty and wealth or the end of a life well lived just gives you a raging hard on?

>>1778094
>How can you judge by the aesthetics of fraud, theft or murder? >>1778054

Look I'm just saying, if I see a woman with a certain nature and I feel like Kidnapping her and raping her in my dungeon to afterwards use her as a model in a painting that will express emotional nuances with clarity and impact like they have never been shown before and no other options could lead to this inspiration, I think we can all agree that this is the right thing to do.
But our legal system is just not build for these cases.

>>1778113
That's not explaining how you would judge murder by aesthetics, you're just saying that you'd have judges that would