Why do so many people on this board seem to idolize this completely

>>1777947
Because commies deserve death.

>awful person
Value judgements don't belong on this board

>>1777947
Because it aggravates commies lad

>2016
>not ironically liking dictators to piss people off

>>1777947

Contrarians gotta contrary

>>1777947
Because a lot of "people" from /pol/ hang out here.

>>1777947
Because he killed communists, and that's all that matters. It's the same reason 4chan as a whole worships Curtiss LeMay despite him being responsible for gutting TAC and thus for a fair share of the problems in Vietnam.

File: 1472065210643.jpg (30KB, 500x358px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x358px

>>1777947

to show you stupid commie larpers you arent welcome here

He has a lot less blood on his hands than any of the retarded despots you idolize

>an alleged 5000 "people"
A drop in the bucket.

>>1777947
>awful person
Wew moralfag.
So judgemental.

Go take a dive in the Pacific commie bastard.

>>1777956
>>1778013
>>1779108
>>1779110

There is nothing wrong with killing commies, but Pinochet mostly just killed ordinary people to cement his power. He ran torture centers where they'd grab random people off the street and do unspeakable things to them. How is that okay?

>>1777947
just a spic dictator

>>1779123
Because they were Commies. If they weren't Commies they wouldn't have been killed. Duh.

File: videla.jpg (58KB, 500x507px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x507px

I personally prefer Videla, but Pinochet is great too.

If you want to see how Chile would look without him, just look at Venezuela.

>>1779156

You're fucking wrong youngter anon.

Venezuela today is the result of a coup by a militar called Chavez. A Dictator just like your beloved Pinochet

>>1779156
Or, you know, you could avoid having megalomaniacal dicator cunts in power and end up like Costa Rica and Uruguay.

File: curaguillas.jpg (67KB, 620x456px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 620x456px

>>1777947

They are edgy teenagers with no knowledge of history. That's why !.

So, lets repeat the lesson boys !

PERROCHET:


He was a THIEF:

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caso_Riggs

He was a Genocide:

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violaciones_de_los_derechos_humanos_del_Régimen_Militar_(Chile)

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hornos_de_Lonquén

Carabineros decapitating Teachers:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caso_Degollados

Militars burning students
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caso_Quemados

Terrorist acts in USA backed by Pinochet Junta
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orlando_Letelier

Terrorist acts in Argentina backed by Pinochet Junta
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Prats


He was a Corrupt POS:

Threatened with a coup when his son was being investigated over fraud to our own army

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinocheques

He was a Cold Monster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVIlQumxP5g
He is asked, what does he think that in Patio 29 were more than one body per tomb.
And he says " Que economia mas grande" ! being totally cold about the fact of the killings during his regime.

Pinochet Regime led Violence against innocent people:

Maria Paz Santibañez. Pianist. Shoot by Carabineros during a protest. Captured on video. (1987)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HdZg9GY83I


Patria y Libertad, a terrorist group funded by the right wing and the CIA was already plotting against Allende before
he took office:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_René_Schneider


17 Years of TERROR for more than 50% of families in chile, with tons of documented torture, killing, kidnapings.
Plus 11 more years of the Thief genocide at command of the chilean army in "democracy".

Here you all have some genuine testimony of the HORRORS of Pinochet's years.
http://imgur.com/a/dTfN1

Here are the faces of many Chileans Pregnant at the time of their dissapearance, which shows the moral compass of Pinochet regime.
http://i.imgur.com/Zbrk2fN.jpg

File: chile-macro.jpg (37KB, 620x200px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 620x200px

>>1779171
Chavez got in power through elections, like Allende, under a socialist platform with massive support of intellectuals and artists, like Allende, he ruled allying himself with socialist countries such as Cuba, like Allende, and nationalized the means of production and put the entire economy under his control, like Allende.

His luck is that oil prices were high during most of his rule, so he managed to get his policies working for a full decade before the inevitable collapse. Allende was already ruining Chile within 3 years of rule.

>>1779183
While you're right about both Chavez and Allende, Pinochet was hot garbage too.

>>1779180
Communists did much worse wherever they got power. Chile had a massive communist paramilitary called the "Revolutionary Left Movement", numbered 10.000 soldiers in their ranks. Pinochet destroyed it killing 3.000 people.

This is not a genocidal maniac, this is a restrained saint.

>>1779183

You're comparing 1000 days of Allende, plus CIA intervention from the beginning, and even before he assumed, when the right wing assasinated a general to stop him being president.

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asesinato_de_René_Schneider

Fidel Castro was in fact an enemy of Allende. He never liked the peaceful way to socialism and was a thread to him in the region.

he did everything in his hands to radicalize the political air during his visit to chile during Allende years. so the comparison with cuba is laughable.

>>1779206
Lol.

File: pinochet1.jpg (100KB, 736x736px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 736x736px

>>1779201
The only reason you think that is because you've been brainwashed by Marxist professors who hate the fact that Pinochet defeated their beloved communists.

He did nothing wrong.

>>1779216
I can't tell if you're maymaying or not anymore.

File: wheat-chile.jpg (22KB, 640x185px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 640x185px

>>1779213
Lol, same argument Maduro uses. "muh CIA intervention". It couldn't possible be that our retarded economic policies like land reform would led to hyperinflation and poverty.

That's why you don't reason with communists. You kill them.

>>1779180
>Unironically being Anti-pinochet

Fuck off flaite, go be poor to La Pintana and then kill yourself.

>>1779206

Dude, educate yourself.

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frente_Nacionalista_Patria_y_Libertad

During those years we had this terrorist group and it was from the right wing.

Pinochet opposition was never a real threat and they didn't have enough guns until 1986:

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internación_de_armas_de_Carrizal_Bajo

Which was a FAILURE.

Thats why they tried to kill Pinochet that year

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atentado_contra_Augusto_Pinochet

And not during the 10 years before..

Where Pinochet Regime did terrorist acts in Washington, USA.... Bs Aires, Argentina, etc.

Pinochet Killed Civilians and people that just happened to think different.

Read more about the subject dude. I lived here during those years.

File: FuckOffCommies.jpg (34KB, 403x403px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 403x403px

>>1779218
Because you're literally dumb, stupid retard commie.

Pic extremely related to you.

>>1779224
Just because some fucktard fucked a country due to being a literal commie does not mean all socialists are fucktards, you fucktard.

>>1779241
>being a socialist

Kill yourself with fire, hopefully you exterminate some Mapuches with you

>>1779224

>That's why you don't reason with communists. You kill them.

This is why you cannot engage in a discussion with sources and argument with a right wing APE that the only answer he knows to resolve a conflict is to kill their enemy.

File: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (38KB, 495x495px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 495x495px

>>1779241
>socialist

>>1779248
>wanting your enemy to live
lol are you dumb

>>1779236

>Unironically being Pinochet Cuck

You must be so proud of knowing your country only by google maps.

Zorrón !

File: RetardAlert.jpg (48KB, 736x414px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 736x414px

>>1779257
If you kill your enemy, they win!

File: dictators.png (898KB, 949x498px) Image search: [Google]

898KB, 949x498px

>>1777947

Pick two. They will protect you. The rest will try to kill you.

>>1779238
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Left_Movement_(Chile)

>The Revolutionary Left Movement (MIR) (Spanish Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria) is a Chilean political organization and former far-left guerrilla organization founded on October 12, 1965. At its height in 1973, the MIR numbered some 10,000 members and associates.

The fact that Pinochet disarmed this group in such a masterfully done way that they didn't even manage to create much trouble during his regime is another point in his favor.

Again, Pinochet needed to kill only 3000 people to destroy an organization numbering 10000 members. Stalin would kill hundreds of thousands to destroy organizations that didn't even exist and Pablo Neruda loved him.

>>1779277

>Stalin would kill hundreds of thousands to destroy organizations that didn't even exist

It's funny because it is true!

>>1779262
>implying with my millions I havent been to all América and Europe

Lol just kill yourself, I have poor people like you washing my dishes

File: Gay.jpg (39KB, 930x523px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 930x523px

>>1779239

Pic extremely related to you. No Homo

>>1779284
>wanting to live in a Nueva Mayoria democracy

Kek

File: cema.jpg (60KB, 640x320px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 640x320px

>>1779277
>such a masterfully done

>B-b-but it took only 17 years

>Muh economic miracle

Nido de Weones

File: JaimeG.png (88KB, 220x227px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 220x227px

>>1779284
Jaime Guzman, his gremialist ideas influenced by Carlism and Political Catholicism and his Constitution, was the real mastermind behind Chilean prosperity after Pinochet years, not the Chicago Boys.

The day Chilean commies managed to get hid of his Constitution is the day that Chile transformation into copper-based Venezuela begins.

File: ancrapswilldefendthis.jpg (197KB, 814x942px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 814x942px

>>1777947

File: ChatFrog.jpg (9KB, 236x237px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 236x237px

>>1779284
>he puts forward a picture with Spanish subtitles
Now how am I supposed to be offended if you can't properly put a language that I can understand in your memes?

Especially on an anonymous website that was made for English-speaking users?

Gee, now you really proved my point that you are in fact a retard.

>>1779301
Lucia Hiriart did nothing wrong

>>1777947
because the Chicago Boys were based

>>1779308
half of those numbers were taken from the year he came to power, and the rest came from the recession that happened a few years later at his lowest point

also the fact that his legacy is still split 50/50 in Chile proves the last point is bullshit

>>1779356
>his legacy is still split 50/50 in Chile

Lol no. He is almost universally despised.

t.chilean

File: pinochet.jpg (25KB, 600x425px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x425px

>>1777947
Because he was a classy Chicago motherfucka

>>1779326
>Pinoshit never went to jail
>Lucia will never go to jail

fuck this country

>>1779356

>also the fact that his legacy is still split 50/50 in Chile proves the last point is bullshit

It's not even close to that. Nobody benefited from Pinochet's autism other than himself and his friends. Everybody else was sucked dry, and anybody who complained about it was thrown out of a helicopter.

>>1779434
Don't bother anon.

File: alvaro uribe.jpg (17KB, 300x442px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x442px

>>1779434
>>1779448
It's very common for Latin Americans to be ungrateful to the leaders who saved them. Colombians hate Uribe, Peruvians hate Fujimori and Chileans hate Pinochet.

It's a people who deserve to starve under a socialism regime. That's why I don't even care about Venezuela anymore, they just got what they wanted. When there are elections here in Brazil, I vote for the far-left parties too, because I believe that's what our people deserve.

>>1779624
Your brain has been literally rotten by memes. Consider getting professional help.

>>1779271
Mussolini and Hussein.

The rest are shit.

>>1779643
Am I wrong?

Political leaders Latin Americans love: Juan Perón, Getúlio Vargas, Lázaro Cardenas, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chávez, Salvador Allende. People who either created massive bureaucratic authoritarian regimes that thwarted development or went full commie and led their country through economic collapse.

Political leaders Latin Americans hate: Augusto Pinochet, Alvaro Uribe, Alberto Fujimori, Rafael Trujillo, Marcos Pérez Jiménez, Rojas Pinilla. Saved their country from communism/socialism, invested hugely in infrastructure that are still the basis for current day economical institutions.

Our people deserve to suffer.

File: 1461368592473.jpg (392KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 2000x2000px

>>1779685
>everyone in Latin America thinks the same

>>1777947
because he killed communists

>>1779685
All those share the same: corruption

>>1779156
>I personally prefer Videla
Are you fucking retarded? Pinochetfags entire argument is that pinochet was a sociopath but muh economy makes up for it. Videla took a rich country and destroyed it, while also being a sociopath. Stupid as fuck.

>>1777947
>talking shit about Pinochet
what the fuck is wrong with you? why are Chileans so stupid holy shit

>>1779236
>Fuck off flaite
lolié

>>1777947
He is a dark comedy kind of guy to some people.

>>1779814
Videla won a World Cup, cuantas copas tenes?

>>1779917
ebin

File: mfw central planning.png (1MB, 1626x930px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1626x930px

>mfw leftards get butthurt at based Pinochet because he effectively used political repression to make his country better rather than worse

>>1779932
why do chileans vote left then

>>1779941

>why are people retarded

Most of them weren't alive for Pinochet's economic miracle. They've been raised on left-leaning government propaganda like the people in every other country. It's easy to vote left when you're young. You reap all the benefits and pay none of the costs

>>1779941
because
>muh desaparecidos

>>1777947
They're memeing

If any of them actually lived under Fascists they'd hate it.

File: 1470967313460.jpg (31KB, 392x400px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 392x400px

>>1779990
>Pinochet
>fascist

>>1779984
but then Pinochet didn´t wipe out commies

Only on 4chan could you find people unironically supporting South American dictators

>>1779984
>Pinochet's economic miracle
There's nothing miraculous about chile's growth, it is similar to pre pinochet levels. Chile has a similar gdp per capita and hdi than argentina, which has continuously been going to shit for four decades. Neoliberalism is good at attaining stability and moderate growth, while abandoning development and increasing inequality. If you want economic miracles you should look at east asia.

>>1779990
Fascist regimes never had the kind of mass migration that characterized every single communist country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Bloc_emigration_and_defection
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balseros_(rafters)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnamese_boat_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolivarian_diaspora

Of course, political dissidents went into exile, but no normal people actually risked death in order to leave a fascist country, like people have always done in communist regimes.

>>1780011
>fascist regimes are bad
>b-but what about communists!
It's like debating 10 year olds.

>>1780011
Europe had a massive wave of southern cone american migrants in the 70s, altought not as big as the present one from the middle east. That was a big brain drain and also an obstacle to development

>>1780011
>>1780018
>a literal free market fundamentalist
>fascist

>>1780005

Increasing inequality is a leftist's definition of increasing prosperity. You do not see uniform improvement to the standards of living anywhere in human history.

East Asia? You mean the places where competitive capitalism has reigned supreme for decades?

>>1780018
Fascism only exists to oppose communism.

>>1780024
As I said, they were mostly political exiles (who like good hypocrites sought exile in Paris or Rome, not in Moscow or Prague).

For example, until the 1980s, Brazil was a net importer of immigrants, it was only after (((democratization))) that we became a net exporter.

File: 2817_2y010_2817_1.jpg (20KB, 430x600px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 430x600px

>>1780044
>Fascism only exists to oppose communism.
And capitalism.

Adiós mi general, adiós
Se pierde en lontananza el sol
Y con el último redoble del tambor
se escucha aún el eco de su voz!

>>1780035
>Increasing inequality is a leftist's definition of increasing prosperity. You do not see uniform improvement to the standards of living anywhere in human history.
All countries have grown with uniform or pro-workers redistribution in some periods. This should be obvious because the opposite would imply that the worker's share of national income would tend to zero over time. Ironically, this would be the position of, say, a marxist.

>East Asia? You mean the places where competitive capitalism has reigned supreme for decades?
Sure, heavily interventionist non-neoliberal capitalism.

File: 1454296607262.png (417KB, 690x460px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 690x460px

>>1780050
>rhyming sol with tambor

>>1780046
>And capitalism.
>

File: Ultimas Palabras Antes de Morir, Ramiro Ledesma Ramos.jpg (41KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x450px

>>1780059
>I don't know anything about fascism

>>1780066
>means of production in the hands on capitalists
>repress misbehaved syndicalism
>suppress class conflict
>we're totally anti-capitalist guys!

File: 1466226914730.jpg (15KB, 231x266px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 231x266px

>>1780079
>if you're not a communist you're a capitalist

>>1780044
political exiles happened to be a good chunk of the middle class

>>1780096
>if you support a system in which the CAPITAL is privately owned are by definition pro-CAPITAList

>>1780110
you are*

>>1780079
>repress misbehaved syndicalism
Every Marxist regime in the history of the world repressed syndicalism. By your logic Marxism is pro-capital.

>>1780110
So you're telling me that feudalism was capitalist even if it preceded capitalism itself?

>>1780120
Repressing syndicates in the context of a capitalist economy is pro capitalist. It was part of an argument, not a independent general rule. Of course, soviet repression is just as bad, just not pro capitalist.

While we're at it, "marxism" encompasses "the political, economic, and social theories of Karl Marx", where you'll have a hard time finding his theory about the necessity of repressing syndicalism, not soviet regimes.

Pinochet was part of the aftermath of Allende's tenure in office

>>1780128
>i don't know anything about feudalism

>>1779224
it´s documented stupid fuck. Truckers union were in the cia payroll.

>>1780175
It's also documented Allende was on KGB payroll. Check out the Mitrokhin Archive.

Hes closer to trump than hitler

>>1780004
He was an ally of the United States.

>>1780212
I just googled it. Most of the results are from far-right tinfoil blogs or revisionist historians.

>>1780261
Wikipdia is a far-right tinfoil blog and Christopher Andrew a revisionist historian now?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitrokhin_Archive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Andrew_(historian)

File: PissedWojak.jpg (71KB, 707x500px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 707x500px

>>1780251
That's right, we won't let our board fall to ideological opponents who would prefer failing systems.

I would fight tooth and nail to protect this board from their shit-covered lies. They won't take it from us, goddamn it.

>>1778013
this honestly

>>1779667
excellent choices, friend

File: 1475616655554.png (231KB, 342x342px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 342x342px

>>1780054

>Hong Kong
>heavily interventionist

>>1779123
>There is nothing wrong with killing commies
I could not disagree with this statement more. I think history has shown that communism is an ideology that does not work (mainly due to the problems endemic to all autocratic forms of government) but no one deserves to be murdered because of their political beliefs. If they commit violent acts in an effort to further their cause, then yes that's wrong and they should be arrested but to murder people simply because of what they believe? I don't understand how you can say there's nothing wrong with that.

>>1781174

Well at the very least, they deserve to be imprisoned for life and deprived of all means with which to spread their poisonous propaganda.

Making martyrs is unavoidable - but dead martyrs are always much more powerful than live/imprisoned ones. That's the only thinking by which I would excuse killing Commies.

>>1781178
if your state is so weak and fearful that it can be brought to its knees by some demonstrators talking about power to the people and whatnot then obviously there are serious problems that need to be fixed.

>>1779624
it is also common for americans to be shot when they go to school.

>>1777947
Lack of a proper father figure in their early teens.

>>1781192

People always come out with this spiel, but it's unrealistic to expect a state to just stand by whilst Fifth Columns subvert it from within. Even the Romans knew better.

If you think of the state as an organism, it's only reasonable to expect that it has an 'immune system' to fight ideological infection.

>>1781218
The key difference being what we're talking about are people not germs, our primary weapon for fighting this "ideological infection" should always be dialog.

>>1781228
The problem with spookbusting is that the state is in of itself a spook

>>1781228

Primary, sure. Not the only one, however. If the "ideological infection" risks the state's continued existence for example, as is the case with Communism (with calls for violent revolutions/etc), then it's hardly unreasonable for the gloves to come off.

>>1780175
>>1780212
>CIA/KGB tosses a nickel toward someone
>that means they are in cahoots
this doesn't actually prove much, just saying

File: commies get out of my helicopter.png (540KB, 1493x1567px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 1493x1567px

how can so many people be so disrespectful to the JEFE SUPREMO DE LA NACIÓN? it's beyond me

>>1781174
Communists are mentally ill. They should be put down for their own sake.

>>1781587
>political beliefs can be mental illness
Brezhnev pls go

>>1779271
Stalin in his prime and putin in his prime. Both ruthless and /fit/ as fuck

>>1779123
>there is nothing wrong with killing Commies
No one deserves death. Your justification is no different than supposed Capitalists deserving death in Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution.

>>1779239
>no one cared about him while he was a alive
>after he dies his disciple cause multiple major economic meltdowns

File: stalinside.jpg (26KB, 278x305px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 278x305px

>>1781593
>Stalin in his prime

>>1779271
>no Tito
smhtbh

>>1777947
>Pinochet overthrows Allende and takes over after socialist policies had been implemented
>muh free market Chicago boys epin we an-caps nao
>Pinochet keeps Chile's copper industry, it's most profitable economic sector, nationalized
>Chile's economy improves on the strength of copper prices during the 1980s totally independent of Pinochet's "free-market" economic policies

Really makes you think..

>>1777947
Because anti-communists got enough anal pain with tankies and their 'le epic gulag' meme.

So they made something even more shitty and cringey.

>>1780163
>what is manorialism

>>1779941
>voting left
>Chile

Way to out yourself as an ignorant fuck in terms of how politics unfold in Chile, not even the "Communist Party" of Chile is actually commie, more like social democrats, and they don't even get 3% of the votes.
And all statistics show that Sebastian Piñera will be the next president, someone who alligns politically to the center right, he is socially and economically liberal, and can't even be as socially liberal as he wished because the catholic church has a lot of power in this country.

The fact Allende was even elected was quite mesmerizing to a lot of people, because it was his third run and nobody even expected for him to win, and he was quite an able orator too.

>>1781672
free market helped to diversify the rest of the economy for when prices dropped again

This is 4Chan
Why are you people still arguing?

It's all a meme

File: Getulio_Vargas_(1930).jpg (824KB, 1046x1574px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 1046x1574px

Because he is an entry level South American dictator.
Superior dictator coming trough.

>>1781687
The centre-left concertacion won elections for 20 years straight since the return of democracy. Piñera is only winning on polls because Bachelet's last 4 years have been a mess, and the centre-left has no strong candidate.

>>1779984
But they were alive for the Concertación economic miracle, from which most of GDP growth of the last 50 years comes from.

>>1781687
>Piñera
>socially liberal

kek

>>1781795
why did he suicide

>>1779271
>Mugabe and Kim the Youngest
Come on now, apply yourself

>>1777947
Because he threw leftists out of helicopters

And in my book that makes him A-okay

>>1777947
Because there edgelords who supports a puppet dictator, literally the worst type of dictatorship.

>>1777947
Because communists have been an annoyance to me for a long ass time, so if I can make jokes about throwing them out of helicopters to trigger them I will.

I mean, it's not like they don't continuously make violent threats in real life, and it's not like they lack for actual violence in their more radical groups.

>>1779171
Chavez is a leftist populist aligned with other leftist populists.

>>1779643
He is entirely right, the average latin american has a victim complex and can't understand any deeper logic than what populists shove down their throats.

>>1779789
So do leftist leaders and yet the average latino sucks their dick dry.

File: 1019461_300.jpg (37KB, 300x449px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 300x449px

>>1779685
>Augusto Pinochet
>invested hugely in infrastructure that are still the basis for current day economical institutions
lol no

>>1777947
It triggers the commies with free helicopter rides

>>1782096
Kek, i thought commies likes free stuff n shiet

>>1781600
Shh, moral standards trigger him.

>>1782052

If you think that pothole is big you've never been to PA.

>>1779115
By that logic you could excuse the crimes committed by Pol Pot on the basis that he killed fewer than Mao Tse-Tung.

>>1779183
Allende had somewhat limited support from Cuba. Castro thought he was too democratic and moderate.
>ruining Chile within 3 years
Allende made some mistakes, but it's outright revisionist to ignore the large number of foreign sanctions placed on his Chile.

>>1779206
>a faction whom I paint my opponent as being did worse so I dindu nuffin

>>1779216
>le Marxist commie professor conspieruhseee
>>1779224
>muh Maduro
While it's not unrealistic that Venezuela had foreign sanctions placed against it, it's an established fact from released US government documents that the CIA and other branches of the US government were involved in Chile's economy.
>that's why you don't reason with communists. you kill them
Not an argument.
>>1779239
Not an argument.
>>1779247
Not an argument.
>>1779257
Not an argument.
>>1779685
>>1779624
>Fujimori
>good

>>1777947

He's like Batman.

The hero we needed, not the one we wanted.

>>1781795
>He favored nationalism, industrialization, centralization, social welfare and populism – for the latter, Vargas won the nickname "The Father of the Poor". He was a proponent of workers' rights as well as a staunch anti-communist.
Fucking BASED.

>>1783400
>a faction whom I paint my opponent as being did worse so I dindu nuffin
funny, reds always use this tactic to justify their genocides

>>1779206
>he believes Plan Zeta was real

>>1783734
Nice red herring.

>>1784533
>red herring
The only kind of herring

After reading this whole post i have not seen any mention of the fact that pinochet's government did not even played economy right up to the 82' and all the efficiency increases and good things come thanks to reforms that were made by the left before him.

The agricultural stsrem of chile was deeply inefficient with landlords owning huge swaths of land with no production while people starved. If it wasnt thanks to the "Reforma agraria" (which only really happened during Frei and Allende's goverments) the fiod economy of chile would still be inefficient.

The industry and market sectors of chile only developed after Pinochet's regieme; riding the knockback of the economy after the constant recession ocurring up until 1983. People and small and medium industrialists lost their investment to foreign capital; to the point where our whole economy consists on the investments of three families of investors who might fuck us any time they want and have done a couple times already.

The infrastructure decelopment of chile happened only after the failure of the free market plans and was only the mere extension of the plans done by Allende's government.

Not to mention the military government destroyed a highly developed and sophisticated comunications program (CyberSyn) because it was "too socialist"

>tfw a conscript burned the original copy of the declaration of independance because it was a "subersive document"

He continously destroyed historical and archival documents; not to mention that his state police harrassed not Communists (they left the country like the shits they were) but regular working and middle class families; actually allowing a consolidation of the "poblacion" culture where all the little shit punks defend each other and force a lawless place; a heaven for thieves and narcos.

Also Pinochet made several deals with Narcotrafficants and deepened corruption culture in the armed forces. You cant be a nationalist and worship this cunt.

You dont have to be a commie fag to hate this cunt; he was an idiot in policy; a corrupt thief as a leader and a coward in the sense he had to shit and piss himself to escape prosecution.

>>1777956
Except the fact that he did not even kill commies; he killed mostly christian democrats and unalligned civilians.

>>1779110
See>>1786002

>>1779115
Of which most were innocent people; not comunists or anarchists or in any kind of left party.

>>1779156
>le chile is venezuela meme
Most of the actions of Allende could have easilt turned back as soon as he lost the next ellection; and the constitution did not allow him to run again after his term. Allende was a deeply democratically traditional president to the annoyance of the most extreme left.

>>1779206
The "MIR"? Those fuckers were against the democratic government of allende; which is also why they did nothing when the coup happened.

>>1779224
>land reform
Literally a necessity according to the IMF. As a matter of fact; it is considered one of the things allende did right by most economists.

>>1779236
>Unironically being Pro-Pinochet
Fuck off to providencia Zorron cuico culiao. Chupame el pico chuchetumare.

>>1779295
Nobody wants to; they are corrupt fucks too; but Pinochet and friends broke the barrier of shame; owning lands and millions of dollars in ""gifted"" state property; enterprises and harmful trade deals.

>>1779305
>tfw your constitution is the most corruptible and ademocratic piece of shit; encouraging corruption and crime in the state and goverment.

>>1779356
Pro pinochet groups are less than 10-5% of the people. How do you fuck up this bad.

>>1779624
>ungrateful
Of what? A system enableist of corruption? An economy slave of foreign capital? A group of armed forces choke full or corruption and no glory? A Pension system considered the worst in the world for the people in it?
>saved
Of what? A democratically ellected pressident who actually had agreed to resign if a extraordinary ellection did not ellected to let him continue? Of unarmed; unorganized; left groups thar did not even support the current goverment? And that pinochet failed to kill and are alive to this day in stronger and more violent fashion?

>>1779817
Because he was shit; check>>1785989
And >>1786067

>>1779932
*effectively used repression to spark comunist support and anarchism out of the fringe group; also allowing leftists to have the path to government open and free.

>>1779984
>economic miracle
You mean the damage control that floored chile's productive capacity in 1983 and only allowed a recovery to pre-allende levels in the 1990's?