Why does nobody ever bring up this chubby fuck in the "ancient

>>1723234

For what purpose?

WE WUZ TUBBY VULCANS!

Anybody who engages in those kinds of arguments doesn't give a shit about facts in the first place. If they did, they wouldn't be arguing about it just like everyone else who has the facts.

>>1723234
Because nobody fucking cares outside of tumblr and 4chan.

the "ancient Egyptians were black/white" argument is a meme

falling for it doesn't make you any better than black supremacists

race is a social construct. classifications of "black" and "white" stems from our racist history that seeked to classify people based on superficial traits

>>1725779
but it's the left leaning liberal gommies that propagate this
most logical people think by their actions and accomplishment not their skin colour, since it literally doesn't matter to anything at all

>>1723234
>every artwork of the human figure in history was painted the exact same colour as the artist's skin

Mansa Musa was black. Greeks considered themselves medium-colored between Persians and Egyptians. Egyptians considered themselves medium colored between Persians and Ethiopians. People were probably all different colors around the Mediterranean. Nobody cared, because they were all part of the greatest and most bountiful civilizations of the time.

File: 12_stvincentsmall.jpg (25KB, 461x573px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 461x573px

>falling for the black and white meme

File: 1392348400879.gif (2MB, 300x290px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x290px

>>1725779
>race is a social construct

>>1725779
Race does exist, but the majority of races are a mixture of different peoples uniting. So "muh racial purity" is a meme, but "wanting to preserve one's current mixture" can have some okay/decent arguments for it.

Autosomal DNA is the best marker for race. Haplogroups are stupid.

Obviously it was repainted by jealous Whitey to deny the black race its glorious history, you racist shitlord

>>1725840
It is, anon. Differences exist between populations, but race as we know it is a taxonomy based on appearance rather than genetics.

>>1725819
there were no spooks like humanism back then, they hated their neighbors just as much as (if not more than) some barbarian 100s of miles away

race = breed
breed=race
common ancestor - different colors, shapes and genetic traits/resistances (without refined selective breeding)

Equiv;

White's - pomeranians
Black's - rottweilers.
Asians - Shitzus
ect

>>1726635
did you know: appearance is largely determined by genetics, and populations genetics yield virtually the same system of human populations structure as historical racial categorizations.

>>1723234
because that lad looks mayan which just adds to the confusion

>>1727762
Not at all

A West African looks more similar to an Australian Aboriginal than to an Irishman, but is genetically more similar to the Irishman than to the Aboriginal

In addition, Africans are already hugely generically variable despite the similarity in appearance. Two black people from different parts of Africa will be more genetically distant than an Arab and a Siberian.

>>1728333
>>1727762
In fact, because Africa is a gajillions times more genetically diverse than any other continent, any serious genetic categorization of humans would need many more African races than other continent races. For example, 50 distinct African races (NOT subraces), if you want there to be only 1 European race and 1 Asian race.

The historical racial categorizations are absolute horseshit from a cladistic standpoint.