>listen to radio 4 programme where the guest wrote a book

File: 1463753999517.png (7KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 420x420px

>listen to radio 4 programme where the guest wrote a book about neoliberalism
>presenter asks them questions
>guest gives literally /pol/ tier answers but with neoliberalism instead of cultural Marxism

They're both labels which are laughed at and declared meaningless by the people who are accused of carrying out their beliefs. What does /his/ think?

I get the impression that they're acting like economists in that they're trying to talk in general terms with a lot of hopwfully powerful abstractions yet they would be better off talking about specifics.