Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7
File: ade-8403.jpg (29KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 600x600px
Which historical melee weapon would be the most painful to get killed with?
I say the warhammer:
>low chance of an instantaneous and fast death
>blunt impact force
>the beak punctures you instead of stabbing you "cleanly" thus damaging many nerves which leads to massive pain.
What do you think?
>>
>>1685292
bare fists maybe a big rock
especially if its a personalised enemy or something, kills ur family first type shit
>>
File: wounds (4).jpg (316KB, 785x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
316KB, 785x1000px
>>1685292
I'd say you have a relatively great chance of being killed instantly with a war hammer. Bladed weapons seem a lot more painful to me.
>>
File: wounds.jpg (25KB, 320x252px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 320x252px
>>1685309
>>
File: wounds (2).jpg (51KB, 200x263px) Image search:
[Google]
51KB, 200x263px
>>1685311
>>
File: wounds.gif (24KB, 200x272px) Image search:
[Google]
24KB, 200x272px
>>1685309
Or maces for that matter.
>>
>>1685309
Not if you were stabbed multi times like me. It doesen't hurt, you just bleed. Its more dangerous even then because you dont know that you are loosing a lot of blood
>>
File: tumblr_lw2cgwWCKC1r7k3tzo1_500.gif (428KB, 500x266px) Image search:
[Google]
428KB, 500x266px
>>1685292
>>
>>1685311
just imagine getting your front teet cut(!) out with one blow
>>
>>1685345
back to 9fag
>>
>>1685339
top kek
>>
File: yhst-16507483819514_2247_59960246.jpg (39KB, 559x640px) Image search:
[Google]
39KB, 559x640px
>>1685292
I wouldn't wanna be hit with this. Or hit with any other medieval weapon for that matter.
>>
>>1685318
it's just a scratch.
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7