Was the US doom from the start? If the American Experiment

As long as stated refuse to act in the common interest, power will flow upwards.

>>1684719
This is implying that there is something inherently bad with imperialism which is not true. In fact, if you are powerful enough to create an empire while maintaining most, if not more, liberties that have existed since the country was founded than you have succeeded. In fact, many international relations experts would point at the United States and say they are the pinnacle of a peaceful era globally.

File: redf.jpg (38KB, 500x626px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x626px

Just look at the disappointment in his eyes

it knew what it was going to happen

America is better than most other countries tbqh

>>1684719
doomed for what? ur the only white country for a third of the lands mass and you got the kings at ur back (canada-atlantic, australia-pacific)

get going

ur beinginvade by spics and shit send more eco hitman to the sth

>Was the US doom from the start?

Well that depends, if you mean "the American experiment" as in colonial independence from European superpowers then no, that has been proven over again to be a valid concept.

If you mean the nation of immigrants bit ("give me your sick, your hungry etc etc"), then arguably no, despite the last fifteen years they have proven that concept valid, even engraving it deeply into their national myth.

Now if it's their own favorite "liberty and justice for all" bit, I'm not so sure. If you ignore the obvious demarcation lines at 1865 & 1968(?) and view the individuals independence from the state, then I might stretch as far as to say that that was a thing up until WWII, maybe post-war as well, but definitely gone by the late 50's

tl;dr it depends, but generally no