>Looking at history through the prism of conflicts between

>>1683513

>t. Cultural Eurocentric

>>1683513
>I sure hope you don't look at history through one ridiculously oversimplified monocausal lens rather than another ridiculously oversimplified monocausal lens

>the one universal thing all civilizations share with each other is that a small elite rules the rest of the population by controlling all of the resources and through various hierarchies
>history is about class struggle and not about various tribes in various stages of organization competing for scarce resources
>one day society will be classless and horizontally organized it's inevitable I I s-swear and both intra and inter tribal competition for resources that remain scarce will just go away

Why are Marxists so fucking stupid?

>>1683685
There's nothing that sells like an easy solution.

Why do you think Libertarians exist?

>>1683685
>le nations xD

Resource competition is a game played by the rich and felt by the poor. Historically, working men and women played essentially no role in instigating conflict. Throughout the Middle Ages, it was exceptionally rare for European farmers to actively participate in wars in their own country.

>>1683699
it should be 'conflicts within and between classes' then, not 'conflicts between classes', if we want to reflect most actions by nations are done by rich in the local nation to the rich in another land.

>>1683699
You do realize that conflicts among farmers were most of the times the casus belli by which various lordships in the Medieval ages could conquer each other?

>>1683750
Elaborate.

>>1684124
not him but:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saukrieg

Hasn't really been much going on between the classes for most of history.

>>1683685
You thought you said something Smart but you're just a sad little autist

marxism is unadulterated autistic religious dogma which zooms in on one issue within the frame of human existence and denies the existence of all other collective human stimuli as some kind of conspiracy created by the faceless evil outgroup rich people

people are tribalistic like chimps and will war over territory for their tribe's benefit? bourgeois divide and conquer, race, ethnicity and tribe is a social construct manufactured by the capitalists

people claim to know god/s and want to enact political change in the world for said deity/ies? they're just cynical exploitative divide and conquer spook-creators who want to control the working class

men and women have different roles in society? obviously this is just capitalist exploitation pigeon-holing people based on arbitrary things like sexual dimorphism. gender is a social construct.

add more

>>1683699
Probably because they were too busy farming, providing resources for their countries armies knowing full-well beforehand that is where they will be going.

File: chloem.png (169KB, 673x637px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 673x637px

>>1683513
>implying ruling classes don't fight each other and their quarrels had no impact on the course of civilization
>implying for most of history the working class weren't kept under wraps rendering them irrelevant
>implying that when revolutions did happen they didn't simply replace one tyrant with another
wew