> "Suppose I walk on to some piece of ground that a libertarian

File: 1473215731880.jpg (70KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 800x600px

> "Suppose I walk on to some piece of ground that a libertarian claims ownership over. Suppose I contend that people cannot own pieces of ground because nobody makes them. In my walking on the ground, I do not touch the libertarian or threaten to touch him in any way. Nonetheless, the libertarian proceeds to initiate force against me or calls the police to get them to initiate force against me. Libertarians are fine doing this and therefore libertarians are huge fans of initiating force... The reason the libertarian is entitled to that piece of land is because they are being non-aggressive. The reason the libertarian's attack on me is non-aggressive is because he is entitled to that piece of land. So their claims of entitlement are justified by appealing to non-aggression and their claims of non-aggression are justified by appealing to their claims of entitlement. It is truly and seriously as vacuously circular as that... It is truly remarkable to watch the number of minds captured by what amounts to a fairly transparent word game."

Where were you when Matt Bruenig BTFO Anarcho-capitalism