In little over a month it will be the 950th anniversary of the eternal cucking of the Anglo.
How do you plan to celebrate the removal of primitive Anglo culture and the superior French influence.
>>1657867
Go to England and fight Chavs on some hill I suppose.
>>1657867
are modern day English have more bloodline of Saxons, Normans, or native Celts?
I suppose I'll start if off then:
> Normans
> French
> removal of a culture
> planting a tiny minority of rulers
>>1659292
Celts
Tfw my 32nd great grandfather killed anglos at Hastings
>>1659318
Doing God's work
>>1657867
>removal of primitive Anglo culture
Clearly the French didn't do a good enough job, considering they were still different enough to get bootyblasted in the 14th century when Ed was a possible candidate for the French throne.
>>1659303
They refered to themselves as French.
>>1659411
Merely because they admired, and paid homage to, the King of France. Not because of any genetic or filial reasons.
>>1659419
>genetic
They heavily interbred with locals
Rollo's son was already 50% French
So you can easily understand that William, seven generations later, was genetically much more French than Danish
>>1659419
They were french genetically speaking, and culturally speaking.
>>1659419
>genetically mostly French with a Danish patrilineal ancestry
>speaking Norman (a Latin language related to French)
>Catholic and landed nobility
>referring to themselves as "Franks"
Yeah they were 100% pure Vikings alright
>>1657867
Listen to La Marseillaise while eating baguette and cheese, all while on strike from work
>>1659303
>Anglo writing hasn't been diluted at all
>>1661188
>speaking Norman (a Latin language related to French)
Norman wasnt a language
It was Old French with very few varying words
It's like calling American English another language than British English
>>1662805
American English is a mix of speech impediment and dyslexia..
>>1659303
>normans
>not french
I'm english and even I admit this.