>An angel, especially according to Abrahamic religions and

>>1611955
the Bible states that angels are inferior to humans on the spiritual plane, but superior to humans on the physical plane.

>>1611988
you wanna quote that for me?

>>1612011
I don't know about Christianity, but in Islam, humans are superior to Angels. The whole reason Satan was sent down from heaven was because he refused to prostrate to Adam, while the other Angels did.

>>1611955
There is no 'goal' of evolution.

>>1612114
Mohammedanism is a pathetic false religion whose inventor is a child molesting false prophet warlord. Its """""""holy""""""" book belongs in the trash anon, don't even reference that filth.

>>1612727
That pedo thing is actually hadith-only thus uncertain or unauthentic.

>>1611955
In early Judaism angels were just cosmic bodies that had no soul or intelligence of sorts.

It just took Babylon exile to "improve" on and add the named angels.

>>1611955
I... am...somewhat impressed. You managed to mix evolution and angels in one sentence. How does that even work?

File: Rewards of the atheist .jpg (99KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 375x375px

>>1612822
Enjoy hell

>>1612114
>>1611988
Hmm weird, I just recall the fact about Buddhist heaven/angels. In buddhism, Angela/gods are superior to humans compared to powers and intelligence however in terms of spiritual fruition, humans have the most potential.

This is the reason Buddhists don't worship gods/angels. It's also the reason why Buddhists consider angels/gods to be worse in terms of spiritual development and considered a harmful rebirth.

>>1612848
That picture and what you said makes no sense.

>>1612806
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Aishas_Age_of_Consummation

>>1612114
Satan isn't an angel in Islam. He's a Genie, angels in Islam are mindless manifestations, like a living telephone.

>>1611955
Would it be possible for a human to kill an angel?

According to texts of course.

>>1612222