What was the bloodiest battle of the Pacific theater during WWII?

>>1601812

Are you counting stuff going on in China?

>>1602038
Not really in this scenario. I'm thinking primarily Japan vs America and Japan vs Great Britain in the pacifc, not mainland asia.

>>1601812
It's proportional. Sure, that 20k doesn't sound like much, but you've got to bear in mind that it usually results in a total annihilation for the Japanese force.

>>1602149
Is it due to the fact that the battles are scattered all over smaller islands instead of a large front that makes the battles involve less personnel in general then?

Okinawa, Iwo Jima, Saipan, and Guadalcanal are the most well-known big battles of the Pacific.

>>1602161
Pretty much. You can't have 100k men in a pitched battle on an island smaller than a major city.

>>1602170
Don't forget Peleliu as well.

>>1601812

Iwo Jima was pretty brutal. I remember talking to a veteran of it a while back and he told me him surviving it was nothing to do with him being a great soldier. it was just this hurricane of piece of metal flying around and you could die at any time

Just pure dumb luck. Thats how you survived that battle. There was no system or anything like that.

>>1601812
Iwo. It's the only battle where U.S. casualties were higher than the Japs.

File: Manila WWII 91-ww2shots.jpg (556KB, 2437x1189px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 2437x1189px

Do you know the battle of manila? Japanese Imperial soldiers killed thousands of civilians and done a suicide defence of the city every building has a japanese garrison. That left the americans to destroy every building pretty much leveling the city.

>>1602161

Not just that, but it was also so much more difficult to project force into the Pacific, especially on land. Dropping troops into these islands required enormous effort and a fleet to constantly supply them with food, ammunition, fuel, medicine, etc. And if you wanted to get away from the coast (when there was an inland anyway) you'd pretty much have to drag all your crap with you by hand.

For the U.S. at least, it cost something like 3 times as much to put an infantryman in the pacific as it did in the ETO.

>>1602298
Ironically, according to Saburo Sakai the Americans could have taken it with like 10 dudes at a certain point in.... 43? and they had a fleet nearby at the time. Coulda easily taken it with no bloodshed but hey, how could they have known?

>>1602291
well there's always cowardice

>>1602370
It was of no use then because there wasn't an air field yet.

>>1602370

The other problem is that in 1943, the Marianas hadn't been taken yet. While strike fleet elements could go there, you'd have a much tougher time regularly resupplying the island until you've knocked the Japanese out of their positions to the south.

>>1602378
nah i think there was an airfield.. sakai was a pilot and was stationed there

>>1602378
>>1602385

It's not like the Americans couldn't or didn't build airfields in the islands they grabbed: the CBs were a thing.

>>1602400
yeah i was gonna say the same thing but hey war's over now

>>1602374
Nope. No place for that at Iwo Jima. Where are you going to hide?

>>1602400
We (generally) didn't in the Pacific for two reasons:
1.) The airfield is already there and worth taking for our own use
2.) If we take the Japs airfield, they no longer have one.

Another issue is that the airfields the Japs built were in key strategic positions so the airfields we DID build weren't in as good of a position.

>>1602170
>>1602268
What about Tarawa?

>>1603364

Tarawa was tiny in scale next to some of the others. The combined death toll was about 6,000 or so.

>>1603437

Yeah but the wrap party was pretty dope

Although not in the Pacific theater, the Japanese campaign against the British in Malaysia during 1941-42 might be worth checking out.

>>1603880
Fuck, nevermind. Somehow missed the "bloodiest" part in the title.

File: American marines with the bodies of their colleagues, Battle of Peleliu, September-November 1944.jpg (295KB, 1280x796px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1280x796px

>>1601812
Consider it this way;

Stalingrad- 70 dead per square mile
Okinawa- 200 dead per square mile
Peleliu- 2,600 dead per square mile
Iwo Jima- 2,800 dead per square mile

File: peleliu.jpg (823KB, 2865x2305px) Image search: [Google]

823KB, 2865x2305px

>>1604120
>Peleliu- 2,600 dead per square mile

Peleliu may have not been the bloodiest, but all the memoirs I've read give me the impression that it was as bad if not worse than Iwo. Over two months of fighting for only five square miles of coral rock. Rock you can't dig into. Corpses decomposing literally everywhere, even those of your side. Flies in numbers so large an audible hum was heard all day. An island with no strategic value. The justification for the invasion, covering MacArthur's flank, ends up being unnecessary. Iwo had no strategic value either, but at least they got an airstrip that would save the occasional bomber crew.

>>1604774
Wait didn't Iwo have a strategic value despite the massive battle for the island?

I always thought the airbase on the island was used for bombing of mainland Japan.

File: Liberation of the Philippines.png (255KB, 315x2417px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 315x2417px

>>1601812
Marines missed out on the biggest land campaign in the Pacific: the Liberation of the Philippines.

Literally the only proper ground war between Nips and Yanks.

>>1602038
China is the CBI (China-Burma-India) Front. Hell its a concurrent war almost entirely (Second Sino-Jap War)

>>1605878
The Marines in the Pacific are a bit of a meme.

>>1605878

At least in the U.S. scheme of things, CBI was considered part of the PTO, hence me asking originally.

>>1605849

It was going to be used for servicing fighter escorts, which turned out to be unnecessary.

>>1605878
>mexico providing air support
????

File: P47_Escuadron_201_mexico[1].jpg (64KB, 775x519px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 775x519px

>>1605993
Escuadron 201. They sent a squadron of pilots to the US to learn how to fly the P-47, and they got used in the Pacific.

File: Aztec_Eagles_P-47D[1].jpg (884KB, 2547x2028px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 2547x2028px

>>1606010
>tfw you will never fly with Mexican bros who just wanted to help fight the Axis in any way they could

File: tumblr_lgtwwv5TgB1qc42hk.jpg (18KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x281px

>>1606039
>yfw they do the yard work back at base upon returning from missions

>>1606051
>yfw the Japanese were hiding in the jungle
>yfw they were trimming trees on their missions

>>1604774

tips 4 memoires pls

i have read Leckie

>>1604774
I never feel bad about mistakes like that. The u.s. benefitted heavilly from intel in another battle, where they took an island with no resistance.

Battles are battles and wars war

>>1606389

With the Old Breed by Sledge is great.

>>1606398
I hope you end up serving, man.

File: loading-presents-for-nips.jpg (244KB, 756x950px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 756x950px

>>1606389

'A Tomb called Iwo Jima' if you want the Jap perspective.

>>1605849
The main point was
-removal of the island as a fighter base for the japanese
-emergency landing area for bombers
-fighter base for escort fighters.

The last thing becomes more important when you remember that the allies were at this point deep into planning the invasion of the japanese home islands. The fear of heavy casualties from kamikaze attacks on the transports and landing ships pushed for the idea of as many fighter planes covering the beaches as possible, both carrier-borne and land-based. Fighter support to the bombing raids became less and less needed as 1945 went on, due to the japanese stockpiling of planes for kamikaze-operations.

>>1608083
So the japanese barely had fighters to attack allied bombers at the end of the war?

File: B-29_468th_Bomb_Group_Bombers_Flying_Over_Mount_Fuji_Japan[1].jpg (62KB, 1241x976px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1241x976px

>>1609404
Here's a picture of B-29s flying past Mount Fuji completely unopposed.

If that isn't some of the heaviest symbolism for the downfall of the Japanese Empire I don't know what is.

>>1602370
If they had taken it at 1943, it would've been taken right back just as easily.

>>1609404
Well, they had several thousand fighters, and several thousand non-combat types on top of that( trainers and such), but several factors such as fuel, training and aircraft capabilities made them store and hide them for late use against the invasion fleets instead of useless attempts at stopping B-29's and fighter screens.