Let's face it, without spooks, history would be a lot more

"Great" Men often reject the spooks of their contemporaries and pursue their own will. It is only in retrospect, when their actions inspire new spooks in other people, that we retroactively assume they must have been haunted by the spooks they created.

No news is good news.

>tfw the only meaningful purpose in life is to create new spooks that carry your legacy

The ego is a spook

spookes are a spook

I generally agree with mr spooky. But seriously this board has a stirner obsession. It's gotta be because the only image we have of him lends itself to memes.

>>1562734
Why would you care about your legacy, or anything that happens after your death, from an egoist perspective?

>>1562872
Who cares about the egoist perspective. If that's his spontaneous will, he can do it. Getting spooked by egoism is the worst way of getting spooked.

File: ns.gif (111KB, 576x747px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 576x747px

this >>1562726

it is in the egoist's self-interest to spread spooks among the masses, the desire to do otherwise is itself a spook, it is like telling people where you found gold instead of keeping it all for yourself

>>1562891
It's a valid point, but >>1562734 said that it's the "only meaningful purpose in life".

>>1562872
It satisfies your ego