Are the Personality Types as described by the Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator okay for discussion on this board?
>>1548353
I think it belongs here actually, since it's talking about a very "humanities" related discussion and not some creepy/weird thing.
>>1548379
Depends on what you mean by humanities. It's a silly personality test designed on flawed assumptions with very little validity. The only people who take it seriously are psych freshmen and upper management wannabes.
>>1548391
Even if it's flawed, the discussion that this test is aimed at is personalitys, are personalitys considered paranormal or the test itself is considered paranormal?
>>1548351
no
It's neither humanities nor history.
sage, reported
>>1548429
"Personality Labels" are pretty much the same as theories about crystal harmonic chakra waves and lunar pyramid astral projections and existential realizations of divine power level anime tulpa reincarnating.
>>1548379
It belongs to psychology, which is Science and not Humanities. But it's outdated and pseudo-science, so it doesn't belong on /sci/.
You have to post it on /b/.
sage