ITT: Philosophers who you think should be more well-known (at least, on /his/),
and a related work you'd recommend to other Anons.
Essentially, just give resources to each other.
i) Heraclitus,
Fragments, http://www.classicpersuasion.org/pw/heraclitus/herpate.htm
ii) A. N. Whitehead
Process and Reality, http://www.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/perpus-fkip/Perpustakaan/Filsafat/Epistemologi/Whithead/Process%20and%20Reality%20-%20An%20Essay%20in%20Cosmology.pdf
iii) Maurice Blondel
L'Action (if you can read French), http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/blondel_maurice/action/blondel_action_1893.pdf
iv) Meister Eckhart
Sermons, http://christianmystics.com/Ebooks/Meister_Eckhart_Sermons/eckhart.pdf
v) Saul Kripke
Naming and Necessity, http://www.class.uh.edu/phil/garson/NamingandNecessity.pdf
vi) W. V. O. Quine
Two Dogmas of Empiricism, https://jonathankvanvig.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/quine-two-dogmas-of-empiricism2.pdf
Pic related
>>1548333
Everyone knows about Heraclitus.
Kripke and Quine are very famous (Kripke being a living genius) but no one knows about them here because most of the people reading philosophy around here are from /lit/, and /lit/ mostly reads the Continentals, likely because Continental philosophy is much closer to literature than Analytic philosophy.
I never see Kierkegaard discussed anymore.
>>1548377
Can't spell analytic without anal
Shestov, Schelling, David B. Hart, Tillich