Why do people here meme about HRE and yet have a hard one for

>>1543931
This post is a disgrace to the study of history. It clearly has a bias, and treats historical nations as either good or bad, a flawed concept in regards to historical countries.

People like you are who are ruining /his/. You can't seem to understand that history doesn't give a shit what you think. I don't even like the Byzantine Empire. I'm just pissed off that people like you think you can talk about history

>>1543966
I am sorry that I am runing your browsing experience.
But an anonymous imageboard like 4chan is bound to attract a lot of shitposting. I browse /his/ for lighthearted and tongue-in-cheek historical discussions.

There are discussion formats far more suited for the sort of biasless study of history you desire. Maybe you should try /r/AskHistorians?

Quality post OP

>>1543995
> I browse /his/ for lighthearted and tongue-in-cheek historical discussions

I do, too.

>>1543931
Not even a Byzaboo but I get tired of people claiming how Byzantines "couldn't defend themselves". The fact that the empire was a thing for a thousand fucking years refutes that.

On the other hand you have people masturbating to meme empires like Nazi Germany that survived for only little over a decade.

>>1544097
I would say it took them 1000 years to slowly died.
Sure, the Byzantine Empire "existed" for all that time, but it never really lived

File: Justinian555AD.png (195KB, 2111x1144px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 2111x1144px

>>1544208
>Byzantine Empire never really lived

you what

>>1544219
He could've reunited the Roman Empire

>>1543931
I think the primary grace of HRE isn't really militarily or whatever, but in terms of civics. Individual rights mattered there more than any place in Europe, possibly barring Italy.

When the French revolted and claimed to spread "liberalism" across the continent with Napoops, the HREniggers were far more civic & liberally-oriented than the French were.

>>1544224
history isn't crusader kings 2

he already lead the roman empire

>holy
>Roman
>EMPIRE

>>1544097
The fact that Constantinople successfully repelled the Arabs while Persia got BTFO'd should be enough evidence that they could defend themselves.

>>1544256
>crowned by the leader of Rome
>still not emperor

explain this

>>1544267
>an empire made up of Protestant kingdoms and duchies is holy because the pope crowned the emperor

It was a shit federation

File: guess the flag.png (234KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 500x300px

Great Thread OP!

>>1544333
>An empire founded 600 years before Martin Luther was born isn't Catholic

>>1544340
A shame isn't it, losing all meaning to your name, losing a war to your "subjects"

>>1544365
>What is civil war

>>1544333
that didn't respond to my argument. How was the Holy Roman Empire not ruled by an Emperor?

Holy Roman Empire was a huge clusterfuck that was never truly united.

And the Italian military adventures of Otto I and Frederick Barbarossa for expansion don't count, they were feudal conflicts or dick waving competitions against the pope. Collectively the HRE was more powerful and influential during teh high middle ages than the Byzantine Empire, but the thing was that it wasn't really an empire with a common foreign and internal policy. Labeling it a feudal commonwealth would be more accurate.

The Byzantine Empire on the other hand was a unified state, with a centralized bureaucracy, one military, one ruler and one common law.

File: EU19_119.jpg (910KB, 2232x1328px) Image search: [Google]

910KB, 2232x1328px

Also the Holy Roman Empire died in 1648 after the 30 years war. After that it was just a royal tittle with no real meaning. And even then it was a mercy in killing this clusterfuck.

>>1544208
>but it never really lived
Constantinople was probably the greatest city in the western world until the Turkening. I guess they didn't expand too vigorously if that's how you judge the glory of a state.

>>1544558
The HRE's localism is what made it such a wealthy and powerful state. Hundreds of feudal lords attempting to grow their local economies in comparison to autocratic depots throwing all of their wealth away on pointless personal priorities.

>>1544219
and how long could they hold those territores?
hmm....

>>1544558
no empire was truly united in the early middle ages.
The technological limits of that time period simply didnt allow an unification similar to the later national states

File: holy.jpg (115KB, 421x546px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 421x546px

Byzantine Empire was the only Medieval state to the west of China and perhaps India to maintain a bureaucracy and complex administrative framework, as well as an urban culture that no else managed to retain after the fall of the Roman Empire.

It sounds trivial to you, but Byzantium was one of the few states that could coordinate logistics and handle prolonged warfare outside its borders, as well as tax much more efficiently and create a middle-class of tradesmen, bureaucrats, and wage laborers, unlike feudal states that quickly devolved into a rigid caste-system.

It's a very impressive achievement. The >H>R>E did not have any sort of centralized bureaucracy or urban culture, and thus, not particularly Roman.

>>1544395
>calling the 30 years war a civil war

m8 happily fuck off

>>1544219
>we must restore the glory of Rome
>destroy it in the process

JUSTinian

File: 1471028919332.png (4MB, 1778x2014px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1778x2014px

>>1543931
dare i say it?

>>1543931
During most of it's history, the Holy Roman Empire was nominal at best.

>>1543931
>For all its flaws, Holy Roman Empire was actually the dominant military powerhouse of Europe for a few centuries.

So was The Empire until Manzikert. It literally held off half of the middle-east for 6 centuries alone.

>>1543931

Even at its height in the high middle ages, when it was the closer they ever got to be an actual Empire with an actual Emperor with actual authority in foreign policy and military, the HRE was cucked by the French ('French' as in actually only half of present day France) and the north italian city-states allied in the Lombard league.

I'm not even a Byzaboo but comparing the HRE's role in world history to that of the ERE/Byzantine Empire is fucking ridicoulous.

>>1545048

Pretty much

Whenever an Emperor tried to assert himself and exercise authority either:

Northern Italian city states rebelled agisnt him

Pope excommunicated him

Bohemia back-stabbed him

France attacked him.

>>1545101
>not having complete authority
>means the state doesn't exist
What is this meme?
Holy Roman Empire existed for 1,000 years, from the 800-1800, the founders of the USA existed when HRE existed.

>HOLY
>ROMAN
>EMPIRE

get outmemed kek t.frfgh

>>1545111
If >H >R >E was anything but a meme before its death, then EU is a fucking country, since Brussels has more authority than the >Emperor past 1648

>>1545111
Anything even approaching a Holy Roman Empire only existed from the 11th century until the 15th.

File: DP272451.jpg (2MB, 3000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x4000px

>>1544691
>urban culture
The free cities of the Empire and its vicinity were important centres of commerce and craftsmanship and families like the Fugger, Welser or Medici that significantly influenced European history emerged from them.

>>1545720
He said "maintained" for a good reason

>>1544691
>It sounds trivial to you, but Byzantium was one of the few states that could coordinate logistics and handle prolonged warfare outside its borders
Then how comes it was no match to the military of HRE?
Even some italian city states and a few french knights could beat the oh so mighty Byzantine "Empire"

>>1543931
>dominant military powerhouse

Nice way to spell France !

File: ministates.png (2MB, 1849x1957px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1849x1957px

>>1544691
>The >H>R>E did not have any sort of centralized bureaucracy.

False, centralised peasant courts to stop abuse of servs and a weirdass voting system to coordinate the 6 million states were a thing later on.

>>1544691
>The >H>R>E did not have any sort of centralized bureaucracy or urban culture
>Free Cities.
Ok bro.

Christcucks.

>>1547307
MY EYES

>>1547307
Who puked on the map

>>1547307
Now to just add a pinch of Liberum Veto in the concoction.

>>1547307
This triggers /gsg/

>>1543931
>dominant military powerhouse
No it wasn't. It was a patchwork of feudal domains that slowly but surely slipped out of Emperor's control. For most of history HRE was not a thing, in the sense of a centralized state that could effectively control most of it's claimed territory. It was totally wrecked when Protestant reformation happened.
>couldn't defend itself
They defended themselves against a succession of enemies for around 1000 years, more or less succesfully for the first 700.

Byzantine Empire was until the 13th century the only state in Europe that had relatively centralized government, standing armies, urban culture, developed economy, developed legal system, and so on.
When Paris had 20,000 people, Constantinople had ten times that under lowest estimates.
This is a shit thread.

>all these different opinion
Republic era Rome or nothing

>>1543995
>that subtle go back 2 reddit

>be the first line of defense of europe for 800 years
>create a greenhouse situation for northern europeans who dont have to constantly face potential ruin by the hand of a religion that makes orcs out of man
>preserve ancient knowledge that sparks the renaissance once the empire eventually goes down
>be called a shitty "empire" by some autistic neet

File: tumblr_m39dbaz5vx1ruo07wo1_500.jpg (125KB, 448x600px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 448x600px

That feel when my ancestor fought for this dude and subsequently rewarded for his actions in battle with a title.

File: christian-warriors-of-the-byzantine-empire-the-roman-empire-during-the-middle-ages.jpg (434KB, 788x1024px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 788x1024px

>>1549723
That feel when you will never be a Byzantine soldier

>>1549723
>>1549749
why do the Byzantines just have such awesome asethics

File: Laocoon_Pio-Clementino_Inv1059-1064-1067.jpg (3MB, 2600x2500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2600x2500px

>>1549785
Because their culture hailed from a whole succession of many other cultures with awesome aesthetics.

>>1547774
>When Paris had 20,000 people, Constantinople had ten times that under lowest estimates.

Not all urban cultures are created the same. A Classical style imperial capital with urban aristocrats profiting off the centralized bureaucracy while supporting unproductive throngs of urban poor fed mostly by the dole and prone to factional riots every other year is inferior to a mercantile city-state populated mostly by artisan guilds, merchants, and paid laborers even if the former dwarfs the latter in population.

There's a reason Venice was able to economically, then militarily, dominate Constantinople. That kind of centralization and urbanization is only good on paper when falsely compared to modern benefits and attitudes only.

>>1543931
Both were cool.

>>1550174
>A Classical style imperial capital with urban aristocrats profiting off the centralized bureaucracy while supporting unproductive throngs of urban poor fed mostly by the dole and prone to factional riots every other year
So....like Paris has been for most of its history?

>>1550264
No, because that has only applied to Paris for about the last 3 centuries or so. The difference is, unlike Constantinople, Paris made up for it by actually managing to run a centralized state that could defend its other productive cities.

>>1549671
>>be the first line of defense of europe for 800 years
Byzantium only ever cared for itself, and wasn't any sort of defense. In order to save itself it sent the Huns west. It did nothing against the Slavs and Magyars who invaded the Balkans and Central Europe as they pleased until the Franks stepped in, and the Saracens reached France and Italy with almost no effective Byzantine resistance outside of Anatolia. Damascus-Baghdad only ever cared about the Syria-Anatolia border anyway as Europe dealt with independent governors and adventurers in Spain and Sicily. Meanwhile the Turks for some 400 years also only cared about Anatolia, and it was only with Byzantine connivance that they even entered the Balkans.

>>create a greenhouse situation for northern europeans who dont have to constantly face potential ruin by the hand of a religion that makes orcs out of man
Bullshit. Fortress Europe was literally forged out of a siege mentality against marauding Avars, Hungarians, Vikings, and Moors. If by 'orcs' you mean the Muslims, then at least these so-called orcs managed to leave Europe advanced cities and agriculture, while forging the free cities from the ashes the Byzantines had left them since the Lombard Wars.

>>preserve ancient knowledge that sparks the renaissance once the empire eventually goes down
That's funny, since that 'ancient knowledge' mostly came from Europe's own monasteries or the 'orcs' themselves centuries before the Byzantines went down and the West had to take pity on refugees only good for teaching rich kids how to read Greek poetry while all the Latin STEMlords and philosophers got actual work done before and after the Renaissance.

>>be called a shitty "empire" by some autistic neet
It was called a shitty empire by dozens of perceptive thinkers through the centuries, and for good reason. The only ones who don't think so are the actual, autistic NEETs here, or LARPing Slavs dreaming about gaudy dresses and jewelry while high on WEWUZ.

>>1543931
At the year 1000, the byzantine empire was the superpower in mediterranean sea. They had inherited roman's techs and knowledge, had the greek fire and so on. Afterwards it went to shit but you have to understand that when people talk about a civilization it's often related to its apex. Otherwise I can just say how HRE was shit just because Napoléon destroyed it

>>1550579
At the year 1000 the Byzantine Empire was well put together for a state, but a superpower it was not. It could not project power very far due to its own unstable politics, however talented its bureaucrats and generals were in the early 11th century. Plus, Roman technology and knowledge meant little by this period as most of its neighbors sans the Bulgarians and Slavs had the same or even better,

>>1550604
>concentration of cultural, scientific, military and economic power
>not a superpower

They were rich as fuck thanks to the trade routes with the east and had a modern and competent army. It was the superpower of the area for a while

>>1550641
That's just a regional power, no different than another. A superpower would be able to project its culture, science, economy, and military far beyond its borders with impunity beyond the capabilities of its neighbors. It was stronger than, say, Ireland, but about on par with the Franks and Arabs, and regularly threatened culturally, economically, or militarily by the likes of the Bulgars, Russians, Italians, and Turks.

>>1550682
What would be a superpower according to you at that time then ?

>>1544267
>pope
>legitimate leader of Rome

>>1550716
There wouldn't be, because there were no states that overwhelming back then that it didn't have rivals and threats not just in the next region over, but in local neighbors as well.

>>1550727
Why do some historians frequently refer to rhat term when talking about states such as Rome, China or the byzantine empire then

>>1550744
Not every historian is a political scientist or an expert at phrasing metaphors and prose, especially not those who use the term superpower for the Byzantine Empire. A much better argument could be made for Classical Rome and China though it'd still be an exaggeration all the same.

>>1545111
>HRE
>state

>>1550763
I see. There seems to be a problem with the definition though, some lean to your direction, with the projection being the most important and some other tend to give more importance to the cumulation of powers and influence. But I guess since the term is a modern one made to describe the situation in the 20th century it is indeed hard to apply it to past powers

>>1547167

The Turks were breathing down their necks.

File: Dindu nuffin.jpg (39KB, 165x178px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 165x178px

>>1549723
WE

File: 1463908218206.png (570KB, 746x819px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 746x819px

>>1547167
>Even some italian city states and a few french knights could beat the oh so mighty Byzantine "Empire"
Italy actually revolted against the >H >R >E quite succesfully, they never managed to get their hands on Venice and the >H >R >E was France's punching bag from at least Philippe Auguste all the way to Napoleon's mercy killing. France has constantly expanded ever since its inception after the Treaty of Verdun, and it mostly expanded North and East, into the >H >R >E. At least a third of France's current territory was at some point imperial.

>>1549671
>be the first line of defense of europe for 800 years
The Byzantines viewed Western Europe as barbarians.

>>1549671
>>1551629
Also, Byzantine actually allied with arabs and didnt want to let the christians through during third crusade

>>1551622
italian city states were vassals of HRE
meanwhile, italian city states dominated Byzantine Empire both ecomically and in military.
That means HRE > Byzantine Empire

>>1550604

>no power projection

What is Kievan Rus? What is Byzantine diplomacy?

>>1551695

>Christians pillage Byzantine town and villages

I wonder why.

>>1551753
>The Byzantine Emperor Isaac II Angelos made a secret alliance with Saladin to impede Frederick's progress in exchange for his empire's safety.

So please, dont call Byzantine Empire "the first line of defense of europe for 800 years"

>>1551761
>French ally with the Ottomans against the HRE despite their ancestors fighting againat the forces of Islam at Tours
>Hungarians backstab Vlad Tepes when he asked for their help against the Turks
Also don't act like the crusaders didn't do shit against the Byzantines. See: Venetian Crusade

>>1551761

Survival is survival. Plus, the Angelos were retards.

>>1551794
sure, Byzantine Empire could survive for a while, but it never "lived".
It was never a power on its on, merely a slowly dying remnant of Roman Empire

The HRE lives on as the ecnomical powerhouse of Europe. Its former borders match perfectly with the highest GDP regions.

The HRE grew through work, while its opponents slaughtered their way to the top.

>>1544518
Because you gotta be an emperor by rule and law not by name