What does /his/ think of civilization? Agriculture is not sustainable

IV was the best

>>1521828
goddammit

VI looks fun

>>1521884
Looks like a fucking cartoon

>>1521825
>Agriculture is not sustainable in the long term
idk bud seems to have been working for a good while now.

>>1521892
there's a viable alternative called permaculture, google it

>>1521891
Is there something wrong with that? IV was also cartoonish.

>>1521895
>permaculture
hippy meme, fuck off you stupid primmie cunt.

>>1521825
Civ II was my favourite but I'm very interested inVI

>>1521895
Sounds good, let's do that.

>Agriculture is not sustainable in the long term, due to factors like soil erosion, crop-killing diseases and global warming eventually ruining agriculture because it is so weather dependent.
Agriculture is perfectly sustainable, you just don't understand how agriculture and ecosystems work. This Progressive "GROWTH! GROWTH! GROWTH! WE NEED MORE ECONOMIC GROWTH!" meme was stale years ago, stop regurgitating it.

>Civilization breeds diseases by having loads of animals in close proximity (especially with animals), dirty cities and shit like that.

>We're feeding drugs to animals causing resistance by pathogens.
Not necessary, see "Growth! Growth!...". It's also not even a result of "using drugs on animals", it's a consequence of doing it poorly.

>Centralised damage to nature is much, much worse than decentralised damage to nature.
It's a good thing neither are inherently related to agriculture.

>We're using fossil fuels because they're more cheap to use - oh that's more about capitalism on the state so don't worry 'bout that for now.
You're right, we should be using Nuclear Fusion/Fission and Solar. OH WAIT, you're too busy taking Chevron dick up your ass so they don't have competition.