Would you say western civilization is the "main character" of world history? If so, who would be the "supporting character" or the "antagonist"
>>1506828
I'd say the "protagonist" role is split in roughly three ways between the East, West, and Middle of Eurasia. So it's more of a rival dynamic rather than a protagonist-antagonist one.
>>1506828
Woah, the future looks bright
The Middle East from Islam on is the antagonist. Every culture they come into contact with they try to assimilated, enslave or destroy
>>1506855
I see it as the west as the MC, with the east possibly a supporting character or natural ally, while steppe civilizations are the antagonists.
>>1506828
For the past 500 years it's certainly been the main character.
Antagonists would be the Middle East/Turks, supporting characters would be Russians.
>>1506828
No not at all. To do so would be to ignore all other history and classify it as secondary. Take your shit opinions and your shit thread elsewhere
>>1506899
Literally worse than /pol/tards. Fuck off back to tumblr or Reddit or wherever
>>1506899
Other history is secondary though. Proof of that is how western culture is being adopted all over the world. The places that haven't yet are either out of touch or are at war with us, and they are fewer in number than those who have adopted it.
That's the wrong picture OP
>>1506973
Kek is that trump on the second to last panel?
>>1506935
I don't really see how the west being most important right now makes western history through world history.
Our western civilization was invented after the fall of the WRE so I don't see how it may have had enough time to be the mian character of world history.
>>1506925
>Not wanting to devalue history on a history means I am part of tumblr
Wow you should really consider suicide. I hear that terminal retardation is terrible in later life.
>>1506828
Lmao, such a loaded question. Asks a yes or no question, then tries to make the no answer yes
>>1506886
you mean the westerns right?