If there was a race of human that was completely domesticated

>>1496370
I don't know why don't we put out a poll with kfc meals?

That said, it is immoral to keep an individual down. It is worse to set an individual "free" suddenly into an urban jungle with no skills. I never understood why it had to be "all slaves are free" and not any slave born after this date MUST be educated, All slaves have rights, etc
Why couldn't slaves in North America be turned into useful people over generations instead of loathed and mistreated to this day?

File: 1470120052618.jpg (121KB, 600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 600x1067px

If their females looked like this then hell nah I'm not releasing them.

>>1496376
Have to allow the possibility of social mobility for meritocracy.

Continuing to call them slaves and mostly treat them as slaves would create a us and them mentality even worse than the one they have now.

If they are just an underclass, identical or almost identical in rights and protections, then in theory they are still in your group, just at the base level rather than wherever you are in the theoretical hierarchy.

You can't have semislaves, they'd just use the power they had to escape bondage.

>>1496376
i wasn't talking about blacks. i was talking about hypothetical race whose sole meaning of life is to serve his master and who gets stressed or even sick without one.

>>1496395
Which was my point. If you acquire slaves, and purposefully improve them over generations, you should end up with useful ingratiated individuals rather than slaves.

>>1496579
OK, my bad. So are we talking something like social symbiosis? Wherein the ruling class is sustained by the supporting class, which in turn gains safety or shelter? Kinda sounds like serfdom. Could be beautiful, but to live on earth you almost have to be exploiting other life to survive

>>1496370
in the first place it's not actually immoral to keep black ppl as slaves t b h
morality is a spook

(no pun intended haha)

(besides, being slaves for white ppl is a great privilege)

>>1496370
If they literally couldn't survive a day by themselves, then they might need to remain in servitude for a few generations.

But outright slavery is not moral.

>>1496370
Just draft them into the military, hire them to do grunt work or servant work, or convert them to some religion that tells them their purpose in life is to serve the Lord and his clergy by toiling constantly for the Church.
No problem.

The negroid race. They were almost wiped off thousands of year ago and have bounced back. It makes them the most domesticated and lawful. The asiatic race is the less domesticated.

>>1496370
Since we would think in a different way than the new race, we would be sociopathic towards them. Morality is fragile. I don't think it'd be moral but I'd enslave them.