How can philosophy continue to prattle on without a single shred of evidence? Help me out bros, am I the only one who can see through the moronic facade of "philosophy" and it's idiotic adherents? Souls? Forms? How about... proof?
Bait.exe
If you're somehow not pulling my plonker OP, read literally anything by or about Hume. He answered your question about 300 years ago
10/10 b8.
Dumb frogposter.
>>1495523
>Philosophy is man’s expression of curiosity about everything and his attempt to make sense of the world primarily through his intellect
In many ways philosophy has been replaced by science. In science ideas must adhere to varies logical stipulations while no such criteria exist in philosophy.
Philosophy is merely baseless abstract assertions.
Despite this I still think humanities can offer a lot of insight and wisdom, and it's still fun to learn about various ideas regardless of whether or not you believe them.
Philosophy sets out the foundations for every particular science. This is obviously true historically but is still the case today, and I don't see it changing. Hard sciences deal with particular problems, it's philosophy that forms a worldview. All the talk today about scientific, rationalist worldviews already imply a specific philosophy. How can you have a "scientific" frame of mind? Outside of a scientist's given field, he is just as clueless as everyone else about other things if he lacks study.
You shouldn't chain three periods when you're baiting, it shows your hand too early.
>>1495622
Can you be so kind any whatever it is you are referring to? Not OP, still interested.
They're working on it
>>1495523
>evidence
why do you put so much faith in perception
>>1499945
>evidence
>perception
Pick one