Is it reasonable to say that Saint Maximus the Confessor's

File: 4844745956_a097a5f4be_b.jpg (271KB, 690x1024px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 690x1024px

Is it reasonable to say that Saint Maximus the Confessor's system of metaphysics is the opposite of Heraclitus'?

I can't really post it all here, since it is too much to grasp in one post, but to give a basic idea, Saint Maximus sees the stages of perfection as going from genesis to kenesis to stasis, and all things come "From [God], by him, and toward him." There is the Logos, and there are the logoi (the words/laws/reasons behind each being); in the Logos of God is no flux, but stasis; God is impassible, impassive, imperturbable (hence why hesychasm is such a big part of imitation of the divine). Therefore with Maximus, flux is not the source of all and the purpose of all, rather it is just the transition stage between genesis and stasis.

John Meyendorf in "Christ in Eastern Christian Thought" credits Maximus the Confessor with creating the first truly Christian system of metaphysics (that is, prior to him, Christians had used Plato's system, and Christians in the West would end up using Aristotle).