What are the philosophical implications of Gödel's

that you cannot know nuffin

>>1480126
Elaborate please.

>>1480725
that contrived formal system is the pinnacle of sterility and the opposite of empiricism , empiricism which remains the refusal to dwell in your mental proliferation, even though rationalist love to say the contrary

>>1480069
That any axiomatic formulation of first order peano arithmetic can never be both consistent and complete. Mathematics is not consistent and complete.

>>1480069
his work suggests knowledge is infinite, that we will never have a 'theory of everything', b/c every time we create a logic system that can encompass more complexity, it will inevitably reach a level of complexity that it can't explain.

Meaning, a new, even more complex, logic system will have to be devised to find a way out of the older, 'incomplete' logic system.

>>1480069
that mathematic logic is bulshit and can be ignored for the most part

>>1481741
No, it means that you cannot demonstrate with formal logic that it is one and also the other. Not that it isn't both consistent and complete.