How do fedoras make it work when they on one hand jerk over moral nihilism and muh Nietzsche and on the other think a woman should burn if she has an affair?
>>1473129
They don't really, they just don't think about it deep enough to realise there's an issue with their beliefs.
Go look at /r9k/ for this being demonstrated even just in the basics of "No women will sleep with me and this is bad" but also "Women sleep around too much and this is bad". They're saying that women not having more sex is bad, but also that they shouldn't have as much sex as they currently are.
>>1473317
Sex with different people, anon. It's not "Women have too much sex" it's "Women are not monogamous"
>>1473323
But the issue there is that's not actually backed up by any evidence. They take the data (I think average amount of partners by 40 is around 8 for both genders, might be lifetime) and just assume that they're all having casual sex. Then they get mad that they aren't having casual sex with them.
Maybe a better example would be anti-natalists who say they're that way because life is objectively worse than death, yet don't desire death themselves.
Apologies if I'm not explaining this well, I'm kind of out of it.
>>1473323
>"Women are not monogamous"
If you're a moral nihilist you can't argue this is wrong.
>>1473337
I think this is a good point anyway. Even if they claim to not be nihilists, there's nothing inherently bad about not being monogamous, as long as everyone involved is also okay with it and they're honest later on.
It is in the end an individuals choice what they do, though it's also someone else's choice to choose not to date them based on that.
>>1473333
quads confirm
It's almost like people you don't like aren't all one big conspiracy or something
>>1473357
i've definitely seen a notable number of examples where someone holds contradictory views without even knowing it. they're called pseuds and this site is full of them
>>1473363
Autism
The post
>>1473357
Who ever said they were in a conspiracy?
>>1473337
I'm not a moral nihilist though, and neither are r9ks
>>1473370
speak of the devil here's a pseud right now
>>1473381
/r9k/ doesn't have any particular morals overall. They're angry about things they can't have, but that's all they really have to say, there's no consistent morality.
>>1473129
>on the other think a woman should burn if she has an affair?
I don't think women should burn if they have an affair. I just don't want to have anything to do with a woman that does it.
>>1473129
fedoras aren't one person
also you can think that morality isn't objective and "real" and still value it. or is that not what's meant by moral nihilism?
most people who advocate not following morals of any kind are probably posers who don't practice what they preach desu. how many sociopaths do you know, people who never exercise compassion, etc.?
>How do fedoras make it work when they on one hand jerk over moral nihilism and muh Nietzsche and on the other think a woman should burn if she has an affair?
What in the actual flying fuck does any of this even mean? Are you having a stroke or something?
>on the internet
>doesn't google shit
kys
>>1473129
I thought fedoras were supposed to be cucks who could only get it up when they're prepping the bull
>>1474339
This isn't /r9k/ or /pol/ you raging faggot.
>>1474353
I was just trying to explain the fundamentals of what robots believe, as there seemed to be some confusion.
>>1474339
Daily reminder that all mgtows are either pathetic beta males who got cucked or closet homosexuals cruising for pathetic betas to give AIDS to
If you get a Godly Christian woman and are a man you'll never have a problem
>>1474361
Doesn't make you any less of a faggot, and you may wanna take a closer look at your picture, and the board color dipshit.
>>1474369
>Godly Christian woman
believing in a myth
hahahahahha, found the beta
>>1474440
Did you get AIDS yet mr mgtow?
reminder that women will say anything to believe that they are not whores
>>1474440
>Women can't possibly be celibate or willing virgins
Spot the guy that's never talked to a girl.
>>1474369
Guarantee every woman in that picture is a bible-beleiving good Christian girl.
>>1474455
>slut
>Christian
Pick one
>>1473129
I'm not sure hats can even think.
>>1473317
what it really comes down to is sexual failures trying to make it seem like they have some control when really they're just not good enough
>>1474465
Both, Christian girls are notorious sluts.
>>1474467
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2681472/She-dropped-Godly-protection-moment-Friend-reveals-Magaluf-girl-family-born-Christians-FORGIVEN-organiser-event-claims-doesnt-know-fuss-about.html
ITT: "traditionalists" who can accept the truth about jews, homosexuals, and non whites but plug their ears on women
>>1474498
Wow, nice statistics.
>>1474509
Off yourself cuckold
>>1474525
Thank you.
>caring enough about fedoras to even strawman them
>associating a big name in philosophy with the stereotype without even reading about them
Stop bumping this cancer.
>>1473129
Women aren't people so it would be erroneous to hold them to the same standards as myself.
>>1473129
Fedoras aren't known for their critical thinking skills.
>>1473333
That seems like a pretty silly conclusion to reach. You'd get a more useful answer by asking women under 30.
>>1473337
Yes you can, there's no direct conflict between having positive first order moral beliefs and being sceptical about their truth value.
>>1473333
That's not how the argument(s) goes, being born is a net harm over not so not coming into existence is a better state of affairs than the opposite, there's no direct link to suicide.