What is the historical basis for libertarian socialism? (i.e left-"libertarianism")
>>1457097
What's with all these thinly-veiled /pol/ shitposts?
>>1457114
>everything I don't like on /his/ is /pol/'s fault
>>1457237
>Hey what do you think of this leftist political ideology? Here's a biased image showing how it's fucking dumb. Oh, and also history.
The collective can literally refuse to let that person use any of their wealth, property and land or even any services the collective provides
>>1457237
>pic literally from /pol/
>no i am not from /pol/, u guyst! :^)
>>1457114
/pol/ is full of authoritarian neo-fascists
/his/ is the libertarian board now
>>1457292
Right-libertarianism is feudalism, not real libertarianism.
>>1457292
/pol/ is schizophrenic, they have no idea what they want. They love and celebrate authoritarianism and classic liberalism in the same posts.
>>1457256
good post
>>1457254
>>1457237
>>1457114
shitflinging turns this board into /pol/
like most political ideologies "left" "libertarianism" is a sliding scale on an arbitrary compass, just like how a location on a map can be 'south-southwest', 'north', or just two feet away.
it's important to recognize in this image that there's a pretty big bias against the government owning anything: 'redistribution.. rather AUTHORITARIAN', and 'dirty filthy hippies live collectively'. Reeks of 'taxation is theft' retards. This is what happens when anarcho-capitalists think that libertarians are on their side. Some government is OK, some taxation is OK.
Historically, the idea of stateless socialism goes back to the communist manifesto -- and anti-authoritarian socialist roots appear in the work of Trotsky, Bakunin, and Dejacque. I'd say that it's most popular form today is advocated by Noam Chomsky (which, even though I'm leftlib, makes me hate it).
>>1457309
/Pol/ is not one person, rather a group of individuals with conflicting opinions.
>>1457336
That's why I said the same post.
>>1457326
>Some government is OK, some taxation is OK.
Define "some"
>>1457353
whatever the people decide on. police are definitely an authoritarian aspect of any government, but i'm okay with them.
i'd gladly give up my dollars for healthcare, but i wouldn't dish out for things i think work better when privatized (education, bank bailouts). I think the autism begins when it's no longer 'how should we solve healthcare?' and 'should we have guns?' but instead 'more gov = bad' or 'less guns = good'
>>1457097
This flow chart thing is bullshit, private property is theft and it would be completely moral and justified to seize that one greedy cunts land and property and distribute it for the good of the people.
>>1457387
no pooh! you're eating das kapital!
>>1457336
Yeah but the conflict is not between each other, it's inside everyone's head.
What they really want is a GF but their Neanderthal-autistic attitude towards grills is not a plus.