Let's see if /his/ have good philosophical stances. Post,

File: 1468047757184.jpg (60KB, 798x587px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 798x587px

Let's see if /his/ have good philosophical stances. Post, and shitpost about how dumb everyone is.

1. A priori knowledge: yes or no?

2. Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?

3. Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?

4. Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?

5. Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?

6. External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?

7. Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?

8. God: theism or atheism?

9. Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?

10. Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?

11. Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?

12. Logic: classical or non-classical?

13. Mental content: internalism or externalism?

14. Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?

15. Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?

16. Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?

17. Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?

18. Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?

19. Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?

20. Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?

21. Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?

22. Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?

23. Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?

24. Proper names: Fregean or Millian?

25. Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?

26. Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?

27. Time: A-theory or B-theory?

28. Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?

29. Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?

30. Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?