There has ever been a population of pure warriors so brave, fearless

>>1453588
lol they ran away from the pope

>>1453588
Anyone who uses mounted range combat and hit-and run tactics is a craven by default.

File: image.jpg (258KB, 820x820px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 820x820px

>>1453588
The Vikings were way better then the Huns.

>>1453806
The Huns have cleaved their way through superior civilizations with ease,while the Vikings have lost almost every battle against semi-trained armies, do the math.

>>1453816
The Huns also got their shit kicked in by Germanic tribes as soon as Atilla died and the Hunnic empire collapsed right after.

File: Subudei.jpg (16KB, 175x263px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 175x263px

>>1453806
>

>>1453820
So what? Huns were terrible at making a stable Empire, doesn't say anything about their quality as warriors.

But Mongols are pretty much better than Huns in every regard.

>>1453843
>Be Huns
>Lose to Proto-Viking forest niggers

>>1453816
>while the Vikings have lost almost every battle against semi-trained armies
This meme again

>>1453820
>The Huns also got their shit kicked in by Germanic tribes

Barely,even though they've outnumbered them 3:1.

>>1453860
Oh,it's a meme?Care to elaborate?

>>1453870
Well, the vikings didn't loes almost every battle against semi-trained armies, for one.

>>1453588
Germans to a degree.

Didn't wear shirts most of the time, didn't bother much with growing cereal crops etc etc. Stereotypical barbarian.

Allegedly the Suebi devastated a zone 500 kilometers wide around their border because they didn't want anyone living near it.

>>1453881
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Clontarf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sulcoit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Stamford_Bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Stamford_(918)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tempsford
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tettenhall
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Thimeon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Trans-la-For%C3%AAt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Edington
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Englefield
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Leuven_(891)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hingston_Down
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Glenmama
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Paris_(885%E2%80%9386)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cynwit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Buttington
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Brunanburh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Brentford_(1016)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Asselt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Aclea

>>1453984
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Maldon

>>1454003
Congratulations,but that doesn't change the fact that they've lost most battles in which they've participated in.

The Romans, especially during the Punic Wars.

They were the Fascist Ideal

>>1454303
what about the rape of the sabines? the attacks on the veii, aequians and the eventual full scale war agains the Etruscans and other latins? I reckon they were always fascistic in that they though Rome was the best ever since they overthrew the Superbus.

>>1454171
I'd like to see a source. Anti-Vikingfags are just as bad as Vikingfags. Perhaps even worse.

>>1454409
Yes, but it was in the wake of Hannibal that they became the unstoppable force that defined them on the world stage.

Imagine how infuriated he must have been fighting a foe who was totally fine with losing almost a million men without ever capitulating.

It isn't even like Hannibal wanted to obliterate Rome or anything, they were just obstinate

>>1454428
I've just posted you the vast majority of battles in which they've participated?within traceable sources?

> Anti-Vikingfags

Anti-Vikingfags have good academic reason to be against them,mostly because they're not as nearly as impressive as they're made to be.

>>1454303
>punic romans
>facist ideal
Wew

File: halt the hun.jpg (288KB, 700x1036px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 700x1036px

>>1453588
HALT

>>1453806
Bait