To what extent do people of a nation "lose" their genetic identity when they are conquered? For example, when the Mongols conquered the majority of Asia, to what extent did they cleanse the people (not via executions, but breeding). I know an individuals lineage extends into the past like a fractal tree, so does it have that much of an impact when there is a degree of miscegenation that occurs? Is it enough to permanently alter the genetic identity of a person, or does it have to be a sustained effort over many generations? Or is the concept of genetic identity a spook or something, and we are all Africans yadda yadda.
I am interested in getting a genetic DNA test, but I'd like to know if it's worth it if interbreeding is negligible.
To different extents, depending on many factors, such as if the conquerors want to mix, if the conquerors merely occupy the elite positions, or if the conquerors actually also bring in mass immigration, and then whether there's integration and so on
Now kill yourself
>>1441980
>Now kill yourself
can we please not do this on this board? can we have one board that is atleast somewhat civilized?
It depends on when and where.
Is the conquered population settled or nomadic? Do they hunt or are they agrarian? How big is their population? How dense is their population? How far away from the conqueror's homeland are they?
>>1442767
back to redd*t kid
>>1442833
Ok so here comes the conondrum, i have been here since 2006, and i am most likely older than you. If i specify what age i am, you're gonna come up with some other "witty" insult to deflect the attention away from the fact that you are a moron. How do we proceed?
>>1442987
Way to sound like an idiot while trying to do the opposite
>>1442987
Most of these people don't try to make an argument. You of all people should know this. I also had high hopes for this board but really who filled this board but the name calling crowds from the other 4chan boards. Sure it's better than /b/ or /pol/ but you can't get away from it.