Why are mongols portrayed as unstopped and invincible when they got btfo so many times?
>got btfo by savage, barbarian chechens not once; TWICE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_Dzurdzuketia
>Couldn't even take one castle in Hungary then got BTFO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Mongol_invasion_of_Hungary
>Tried to fully conquer Poland then got BTFO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Mongol_invasion_of_Poland
>got BTFO by Serbians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Europe#Against_Serbia_.281291.29
>BTFO by Vietnamese
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_B%E1%BA%A1ch_%C4%90%E1%BA%B1ng_(1288)
>BTFO by Burmese
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Mongol_invasion_of_Burma
>btfo by japs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_Japan
>>1438496
>Why are the Romans portrayed as invincible when they got BTFO so many times?
>>1438496
>I choose to ignore the fact their btfo/btfo'd ratio heavily favors them and cherry pick these times they didn't win and present it as evidence that they weren't all that
That's real fucking neat-o, senpai
>>1438677
OP is a cuck
>>1438624
The romans built a large and powerful empire that lasted for a much longer time then the mongol empire did, and contributed far more to civilization in general then the mongols ever could.
>>1438677
They did well in their initial invasions, later they got their asses kicked more and more often. Funny how you don't mention that though.
>>1438881
That's because the unstoppable Mongol empire people talk about is the actual unified one Genghis lead, which let's face it, btfo'd the fuck out of everybody
>>1438881
Doesn't change the fact that Mongolia BTFO everybody in Eurasia
>>1439206
Genghis couldn't even make it past the Huai river.