http://hitlerorchurchill.info/ Test your knowledge of WWII.

>>1428947
dam churchy was a dick

>>1428947
What's the purpose of this? "Boohoo Churchill was literally Hitler those white cismales are so mean!"

It's funny at the start, but then it just turns into pure butthurt nazibooism.

>>1428947
Meh, some of these aren't even correct. There was no hyperinflation during the Great Depression in Germany.

>>1428984
I'm assuming you're talking about the time period of the American great depression?

>>1428947
83%

>>1428967
>What's the purpose of this?
Probably to show that Churchill isn't as much of a noble figure as we remember him as. He was kind of a massive asshole and Hitler, though a horrific person, was loved in Germany and respected out of it.

It's about nuance and fact. How about you actually check the source before making up assumptions, you nonce?

>the knight of long knives, a riot that broke out after jews killed a german diplomat
>a riot that broke out
boo-hoo naziboo

>was the first to begin targeting civilians...
Didn't hitler start it with Spain?

>>1428947
I got 75% too. Hit a few knowledge gaps.

Became extremely easy when you realize it is trying to make Hitler look good.

>>1429020
Perhaps, but does that invalidate the test?

>>1428992
Yes, is there any other economic crisis called the Great Depression?

WTF i hate churchill now

>>1429028
No, but Churchill was right about India anyway. Jews make good bagels and fun movies at least.

>>1428947
83%
this is brilliant

>>1429029
Each country has its own "the great depression".
Americans are often guilty of forgetting that other countries exist, so I'll forgive you.

>Hitler... came to power during the time of the hyperinflation
>Correct
some """test"'"" you got there

>>1429086
>Each country has its own "the great depression".
yet only one is called The Great Depression
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression

>>1429125
Yes, the american one, because americans only know of that one, and everyone else knows americans only know of that one.
Yet occasionally we slip and make un-american statements, please excuse our insensitivity, it isn't meant as an insult.

>>1429137
Your insignificance is pitied

>>1429152
I understand your deflection and accept your surrender.

80%, didn't even actually fully read many of them, I didn't even knew most of the stuff, but just correctly guessed upon how I thought the creator wanted to make the questions look.

File: Hitler_or_Churchill_-_2016-07-18_16.15.47.png (386KB, 1583x781px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1583x781px

Mission accomplished.

87%

>>1428947
>Massive Inflation
>Shortage of Labor
The test fell for the memes.

>>1428947
hitler dindu nuffin he was a good boy :((

>>1429236
The test isn't say that.

Why are you so retarded?

The test just shows that Churchill wasn't the honorable knight who never did anything wrong.

Why do people sperg out about this?

>>1428947
This is a straight up holocaust denier site

>>1429052
>churchill was right
about what?

>>1429249
No it isn't, there is no denial of Hitler and his goons' antisemitism by words and actions, including the concentration camps themselves.

>>1429249
cuck or jew detected

>>1429249
Good goy.

>>1429289
The fact you had to throw all those qualifiers in your post confirms it.

>>1428947
Breaking news: most people back then weren't PC dipshits, a fuckton of europeans were antisemitic, most facts can be looked through from different lenses and ignoring certain details while focusing on others can paint an entirely different picture.

The agenda of that site is as retarded as the people that try to make nazis look worse than other genocidal maniacs.

>>1429249
ITS LIKE ANOTHER SHOA!!!

>>1429322
Here's another qualifier, I'm a Joo and that website is kosher.

It could use a spellcheck, that's it.

>>1429120
Well, technically it's right.

Hitler came to power during the Great Depression, which is when inflation started to ramp up again, because the Weimar Republic was living off of American loans.

>>1429354
Publishing polticial manifestoes blaming the Jews for communism, praising fascism as the solution, and establishing eugenics programs are no mere lack of contemporary political correctness.

Churchill was irredeemably evil scum through and through, a villain, and just another imperialist, you'd see him for what he was if only he had a moustache.

>>1429433
>Publishing polticial manifestoes blaming the Jews for communism, praising fascism as the solution, and establishing eugenics programs are no mere lack of contemporary political correctness.
People in every industrialized country before WW2 did these things

>>1429433
So you're saying he was an average european?

>But muh modern sensibilities

>>1429423
hyperinflation
not just inflation

>>1429004
IIRC he just told the air force to intervene and it was Goering's decision to bomb civilian areas

>>1428947
72% not bad?

>>1429460
>People in every industrialized country before WW2 did these things
Well the Jews didn't, for example.

>>1429470
No, the average European was minding his or her damn business and wanted peace.

It's important that we understand Churchill for who he was historically: /pol/ before it was cool, even going as far as to anticipate Hitler by jumping five years earlier on the Jew-blaming anticommunist bandwagon.

>>1429486
>Well the Jews didn't, for example.
That's a pretty shitty example, m8. The Jews weren't anti-semitic? Wow what a shock. The point is that anti-semitism was not some radical underground belief at the time but was a common middle-class affectation that people would adopt even if they didn't particularly care about the Jews at all and were just "minding their own damn business" as you say.

File: IMG_20160717_210853.jpg (60KB, 640x636px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 640x636px

>>1428947
81% yeah boi

>>1429519
>The Jews weren't anti-semitic?
well there's
>praising fascism as the solution, and establishing eugenics programs
too to the inexaustive list of Churchill's sins.

>The point is that anti-semitism was not some radical underground belief at the time but was a common middle-class affectation that people would adopt even if they didn't particularly care about the Jews at all and were just "minding their own damn business" as you say.
So only some bourgeois closet nazis or otherwise proto-/pol/ like Henry Ford count as people?

Any source on the Jews being so very commonly hated by those that weren't, say, commanded to murder them by agreeable fellows like Churchill and Hitler?

File: le spartacist paper distributor.jpg (110KB, 497x746px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 497x746px

>>1429486
>the Jews didn't
>semites aren't antisemitic
Huh...now that really makes you think

>>1429579
>The Jews weren't anti-semitic?
well there's
>praising fascism as the solution, and establishing eugenics programs
too to the inexaustive list of Churchill's sins.

Why did Hitler go down in history as a villan though? He did all those good things and was a respectable person.

Was it because of the 6 million?
Many other peopled killed far more than him, and they aren't regarded as badly.

Was it because of the War?
There have been countless other wars before, and no warmonger was ever regarded as a villain as much as Hitler was.

I don't understand.

>>1428947
88%, there's a lot of false claims about Hitler in there though.

>>1429994
>started the worst conflict in known history
>surprised when considered a villain
Sometimes all the good you did can be unwritten when your actions directly lead to the death of 60 million people.

>>1428947
>Fought for his country in WW1
Hitler fought for Germany not Austria

File: 027.jpg (164KB, 613x494px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 613x494px

>m-muh neo-liberal hero, I bet pol did this!!

>>1428947

the eternal anglo

>>1430011
>this meme again
He considered himself German, his family considered themselves German

>>1430011
Austria is of German clay

>>1429994
>Got pinned with Genocide
>Killed himself instead of getting captured and put on trial
But his worst sin
>Lost the war

>>1428947

its hilarious how Churchill keeps being voted in as national hero, shows how education and media are used to keep people stupid.

90% do I get a cookie?

88%
got real easy when you all the hitler answers had favorable wording

>>1429028
considering that some of the answers were either distortions of historical fact, ie blaming churchill for russian POW camps, or outright holocaust denial

>test shows both churchill and hitler as actual human political figures rather than le good guy vs le ebil nazi
>/his/ gets triggered b/c this isn't what they were taught in community college

Churchill was not only a cunt and a drunkard, but a damn incompetent commander

84%

Laughing at the triggered anglos and leftcucks ITT

83% the nations and dates mention are a pretty big giveaway, and it clearly trying to make Hitler look better than he was.

I was pretty aware that Churchill was a right cunt though, I hate that there's a huge cult of presonality based around him.

>we will force this war on hitler if he wants it or not

Redpill me on this quote.

>>1430480
They will throw Poles on Hitler in 1939 and then enter the war as the "good guys" defending them LMAO.

I genuinely feel bad for poles, they've been used.

>Hitler sent Hess to Britain
What a load of bullshit, stopped doing the 'quiz' here. Churchill was a drunk cunt, but this website has /pol/'s 'adolf dindu nutin wrong ;(' crap smeared all over it.

>>1430229
Don't see anyone getting triggered, though.
Except for the naziboos.

>>1430672

Exactly what part was "adolf dindu nuffin"?

Literally nowhere do they claim Jews weren't put in camps or that Hitler was a great guy.

But I guess facts hurt a lot when you're a liberal living in a western nation and have never been exposed to actual problems.

>>1430701
Why do fascists get so upset when someone talks shit about Hitler? Are they still sore losers for a war lost 70 years ago?

>>1430721

Lol, is that your counterargument? 10/10

File: Party Pepe.gif (1MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x200px

>>1430737
>Every post on 4chan is an argument, and I must win
lol ebin

>>1428947
>people died bacause food and medicine was cut off from the camps

Yeah, the gass chambers and the shooting had nothing to do with it...

File: ab3fca4bb2[1].png (26KB, 1034x261px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 1034x261px

>>1429208
This, I was getting them all right out of the assumption as well until I got to this old revisionist argument and stopped.

>>1429086
It's not called the new world for no reason dude...

>Churchill declared war on HItler
What retard did this test?
Churchill was just a minister of the navy when the Brits declared war on Germany.

>>1430701
>a liberal living in a western nation

I'm eastern european, you useless pigfuck. Your shitty website is filled to the brim with half-truths, i.e. "Ukrainians welcum'd Germans :)". For some reason it is not mentioned that after a few years of "Tolerant and Respectful™" Nazi management, Germans couldn't take two steps in Ukraine without catching partisan bullets. But I guess that's detrimental to shit that you're trying to peddle.

God, where do faggots like you even come from? Never in my life have I met a normal and adjusted person, who would be politically conservative and would support Hitler, even behind closed doors. It's always misfits, losers and zeros who do this shit, desperately craving for any identity they can get.

Seriously, have one last wank over that "the greatest story never told" youtube video and kill yourself.

75%, thought I'd do a lot worse desu, my WWII history isn't so good

>He and his allies refused to let the International Red Cross moniter their prisoner of war camps, where an estimated 6.3 million people died.
They are talking about the reds here, right?

Anyway, while I do agree Churchil was a big cunt this test is very much biased.

87%

>>1428947
87 ez just remember if it sounds worse than it was it was churchill

75% score, desu it was quite easy considering there were only 2 possible answers.

97 %. i guessed a lot of them

I was trying to get everything incorrect, but got a few correct by accident.

The problem is a few of the things were, "Churchill did almost the same exact thing" so it wasn't as obvious which was which.

>>1428947
80%, got a string of wrong ones once i got tired though. (clicked "Churchill" after thinking Hitler as i'd shortened the process subconsciously to "think > click" without moving it over to Hitler.)

It really over-eggs the pudding when it gets into "A guy wrote 4 million then revised it to 1 million!" though. A single reference to the fact Britain used camps in the Boer war would have been sufficient.

>>1428947
74%, after a while i got the feeling it was made by a wehracuck, theres alot of mentions of English actions and brutality and theres only 3-ish mentions of German attrocities. They talked about the English being the first to bomb civilian targets when the Germans did that in the first days of the war

w/e tho, those fuckboys need a victim complex to survive

81% it's been a while since I've done any history tests. :)

1:

The simple fact is that neither of these men were paragons of virtue or outright evil. No actual statesman ever has been and history is full of different facts that tend to get white washed over by later historians. The shocking fact of it is, that the general history books are very one sided in their presentation of history, but then they need to be, as it is for general knowledge and not for the actual differentials in history.

Churchill was an Imperialist, and had served in several different campaigns and places within the British Empire. His experience of India came from the fact that he had been stationed there and had wanted at one point to aim for Viceroy of India.
He was always against the Indian independence movement, because he rightly saw that British Imperial acquisitions were the lifeblood of trade for the British Empire, and the loss of India would have made Britain a third rate power.

His view towards Muslim, was born out by his experience of fighting with the British in the Sudan against the Mujehadin who had rebelled against British rule, and struck up with religious fervour proved extremely difficult to defeat.

>>1429086
lol america amirite XDDD

got 82
this website is obviously trying to hand you a conclusion though

2:

Churchill’s views on Communism and Socialism was that both systems spread misery throughout their populations and squashed any sort of social motivation or capitalist spirit. However to criticise his decision not to declare war on the Soviets when they invaded Poland is madness.
The British government had strongly denounced the invasion of Finland by the Soviet Union, but the rising tensions with Germany tapered off any offer of full military assistance.
That being said, Hitler funded the Finnish war effort, as well as Churchill in an attempt to replicate the results of the Spanish civil war, and prevent the country from falling under the power of a Communist government.
Not forgetting that the USA at this time was still pursuing an isolationist policy, and with a Britain that was not yet ready to fight a full fledged war. The declaration of war on both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany would not have been prudent as defeat would have been nearly guaranteed.

The bombing of civilians is a point that could be argued, as Hitler was the first to bomb civilian populations, but again the British were committed to total war, and were willing to win at any costs. William L Shirrer's Berlin Diary is good reading on this point. The bombings coincided with the fact that the German people already having been on rations from before the beginning of the war, had not been enthusiastic about another war with Britain, and the general policy was to try and add to war weariness with a general bombing policy in hopes it would turn the German people against the government.

Again lets not forget another example of his total war stance, that it was Churchill who ordered the destruction of the Vichy French Navy lest it should capitulate with the Reich.

>>1429994
lol are you simple minded

>>1431564
>Hitler funded the Finnish war effort
Didn't the Germans stay completely out of the first Finnish war with the USSR?

got 87%

>>1431585

The Germans nominally did not commit troops to the winter war, but they provided materials and war support. This was before the non-aggression pact.

If you look at Finnish uniforms of the period, you will note the resemblance, they were German made.

>>1429210
i see you too know how to edit source

>>1429028
Yes. They brushed over a lot of the horrifying shit that the Nazis did.

Churchill was a bastard but Hitler was worse.

>>1431631
Didn't the non aggression pact predate the winter war?
You aren't thinking of the Finnish civil war?

File: hitler (1).gif (996KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

996KB, 500x400px

>>1429249
oy gevalt

the test is accurate but the way it's presented makes clear the authors intentions

don't really care though, tb h

>>1431631
you sure are ignorant

>>1431647

Not sure to be honest.
Been a while since I've actually read the history of the period, so I'm going off of memory. I do know that there was funding going on from Germany, there was even a meeting later on by Hitler and the head general of Finland, when he tried to convince the Finns to go to war against the Soviets.
Also if you look at the majority of their equipment, most of their weapons were an admixture of foreign armaments, but the majority of it was German made.

You're all just butt hurt because Churchill was a fucking grub, even though your countries have been told to suck his necrotic dick for decades.

>>1431631
>>1431713
>If you look at Finnish uniforms of the period, you will note the resemblance, they were German made.

No. Similarities in the m/36 were born from earlier relations (such as Finnish jaegars being trained in Germany in 1915).
If anything, the German State consciously withheld aid that was being sent through them to Finland because they were fairly sure the Winter War wouldn't actually be a thing. Being proven wrong in that regard is what encouraged them to usher Finland to take part in Operation Barbarossa (which Finns consider their Continuation War).

>Also if you look at the majority of their equipment, most of their weapons were an admixture of foreign armaments, but the majority of it was German made.

Finnish equipment was not only leftover from Imperial Russian times. There were French manufacture cannons, a few British Vickers they re-modeled, and other precious bought or exchanged items. They mostly bargained for mosins that they then tweaked. Whatever German equipment that visited Finland in 1918 during their Civil War (with the German Baltic Sea Division) mostly left with them.

German equipment was much much more prevalent from 1940 onwards.

>>1431776
I've known Churchill to be the scheming Anglo he is since primary school though

t.ireland

>>1431776
What are you talking about?
At least half the people complaining about the test are pointing out Churchill was a big dick.

>>1431776
What are you talking about?
At least half the people complaining about the test are pointing out Churchill was a dick.

File: Screen Shot 2016-07-18 at 9.19.45 PM.png (66KB, 1404x888px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1404x888px

88%. Pretty eye opening. My father always says that Churchill was a great man. Can't wait to give him some of these facts.

I got 82%. Churchill was a pretty odious person, but the constant "hitlur dindu nuffin, he a gud boi" framing got old real quick. Churchill might have said and done some bad shit, but he didn't make the deadliest conflict in human history a thing, that was Hitler (naziboos pls, Hitler's actions directly caused WWII), and Churchill didn't genocide 11 million people (naziboos pls, the allied supply bombing wouldn't have killed millions if the Nazis hadn't have specifically targeted those people and put them into concentration camps).

>>1428947
90%

>>1428984
shiggy

>>1429213
same friendo

>>1432070
Churchill is directly responsible for Turkey entering WWI on the Gerry side, which means he's indirectly responsible for ISIS, because he used vague phrasing

File: Capture.jpg (23KB, 846x267px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 846x267px

>>1428947
I don't know much about Churchill so it was mostly educated guesses

File: Oradour-sur-Glane-Hardware-1342.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1536px

>>1428995
The only people who lionize Churchill are armchair "historians". There was a reason he was booted out of office after the war.

>>1429028
Yes, completely.

>>1429994
Because they killed Europeans in their own backyard. Everyone had it thrown in their face after the war because the Nazis and Allies documented everything. It's not like the Soviets, IJN in China or Pol Pot where people in the west just ignore it and change the channel.

>The women and children were locked in the church and the village was looted. The men were led to six barns and sheds, where machine guns were already in place. According to a survivor's account, the SS men then began shooting, aiming for their legs. When victims were unable to move, the Nazis covered them with fuel and set the barns on fire. Only six men managed to escape. One of them was later seen walking down a road and was shot dead. In all, 190 Frenchmen died.

>The SS men next proceeded to the church and placed an incendiary device beside it. When it was ignited, women and children tried to escape through the doors and windows, only to be met with machine-gun fire. 247 women and 205 children died in the brutal attack. The only survivor was 47-year-old Marguerite Rouffanche. She escaped through a rear sacristy window, followed by a young woman and child. All three were shot, two of them fatally. Rouffanche crawled to some pea bushes and remained hidden overnight until she was found and rescued the next morning. About twenty villagers had fled Oradour-sur-Glane as soon as the Stormtroopers had appeared. That night, the village was partially razed.

>Several days later, the survivors were allowed to bury the 642 dead inhabitants of Oradour-sur-Glane who had been killed in just a few hours. Adolf Diekmann said the atrocity was in retaliation for the partisan activity in nearby Tulle and the kidnapping of Helmut Kämpfe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oradour-sur-Glane_massacre

>>1432795
>It's not like the Soviets, IJN in China or Pol Pot where people in the west just ignore it and change the channel.
This. It took the British all of 7 years after the war to intern an entire ethnic group in concentration camps using forced labor after the war, and they still don't get shit. Because it wasn't in Europe.

>Hitler brought Germany out of its economic problems
Literally only nazis think this

>>1431641
I didn't need to, in fact I didn't even think about editing it.

File: Screenshot_2016-07-19-17-26-59.png (45KB, 768x1280px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 768x1280px

>>1428947
This site is awfully biased

>>1428947
>70%
Meh, I could hardly care at this point.

File: 1454112671075.jpg (162KB, 1281x654px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1281x654px

Here's the real test: Can you name all of the historical figures in this dumb meme?

>>1428947
>Start test
>Oh really? That's kinda neat to know
>Huh, I'm starting to see a pattern
>Okay, this is really starting to get a bit much, but maybe they'll balence it
>Yeah, this is basically just a Nazi apologist site

>>1428947
too much nazi propaganda
>boo hoo evil churchill was the one to blame we dindu nuffin
got 73%

86 lads

File: 1462089089872.png (31KB, 720x644px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 720x644px

>>1434689
same here lad

>>1428947
Can't tell if this is anti-Churchill or pro-Hitler

Hm

File: 1463547012993.jpg (40KB, 650x443px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 650x443px

>tfw there are actually anglo apologists in this thread

They should've stopped after the first half of the test, it was mildly interesting. Went to shit with all the naziboo """""facts"""""

File: 1463540197923.jpg (62KB, 800x544px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x544px

FILTHY ANLGO RATS GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT

>>1429312
>>1429313
>>1429398
Not an argument

>>1429433
He was a conservative; OF COURSE he was evil.

>>1428967
Most Americans compare Churchill to Roosevelt when he's got a bodycount comparable to Stalin

>>1429994
Invading other countries AND committing a major genocide is going to give you a bad reputation. Plenty of other rulers have killed millions in war, but on top of that Hitler systematically killed civilians, and did so as leader of a country Europeans actually care about. Genocides in say Africa, Russia, Asia, the middle east, western society could care less about those. But doing it in the middle of Europe is going to be difficult to forget.

>>1430049
>This one website said so, so it must be correct!

>>1430556
How did they "throw Poles on Hitler"? Did any Polish military units cross the German border prior to German deciding to invade?

>>1430854
>God, where do faggots like you even come from? Never in my life have I met a normal and adjusted person, who would be politically conservative and would support Hitler, even behind closed doors. It's always misfits, losers and zeros who do this shit, desperately craving for any identity they can get.

>Seriously, have one last wank over that "the greatest story never told" youtube video and kill yourself.

THIS

>>1436240
The problem is that they were very much distorting facts, or am I the only one who get that vibe?

>>1436272
you're anti-intellectual

>>1431919
>Can't wait to give him some of these facts.
>facts
Wow, one website says this and you believe it immediately? You're really gullible aren't you?

>>1436281
I have actually seen people claim the Gleiwitz Incident was a real Polish attack.

>Naziboo
>Naziboo
>Naziboo
>Naziboo

This website really is more segregated than I thought.....

>>1436296
>Someone made a website about it, it can't be wrong!
HAHAHAHA, What?
I'm not gullible, therefore i'm anti-intellectual?

>>1429029
Can you please fall off your mobility scooter and choke on your cheeseburger already?

>>1436315
>I have actually seen people claim the Gleiwitz Incident was a real Polish attack.
I don't know what to say, they literally think, that from day one, the nazis did nothing wrong, ever.

File: IT WAS YOU NIGGA.jpg (76KB, 523x929px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 523x929px

>>1430783
>gass chambers
Not real. No proof. The ovens couldn't fit bodies.
:^)

File: 1468645860645.jpg (66KB, 549x670px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 549x670px

>>1436323

>>1436345
Gas can't kill cuz teh body just coughs it out :^)

>>1430854
> Seriously, have one last wank over that "the greatest story never told" youtube video and kill yourself.

Any good rebuttal videos? I quite enjoyed some of it, adds a nice perspective. What does /his/ think of David Irving?

>>1436338

No you don't understand, Sender Gleiwitz was an inside double blind ultra falseflag operation organized by the Jews discredit the Germans by making it look like the Germans were forging casus belli on Poland.

t. Knower

>Invaded neutral Poland after Poland refused to allow him to build a road through the Danzig Corridor and after his people living in the region faced persecution from the Poles.
t. Goebbels

File: sperg hitler.jpg (142KB, 1916x1076px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1916x1076px

>>1436360
>What does /his/ think of David Irving?
http://archived.moe/his/search/text/David%20Irving/

>>1436354
What are you trying to say? That if someone believes something as fact they should be able to prove why? I agree, please link me your sources?
Or are you trying to tell me to give you sources? Well you see, I only said that believing one website, without sources of its own is gullible, I never said that without a doubt the information is false, maybe it's true, maybe it isn't, but I would need more than one source to confirm that, a more credible source at that. As i'm not trying to defend anything, there is no information for me to source, in contrast to you, who is so convinced by it that you were gonna present it as "facts" to your father. Therefore it should be no problem for you to give me some sources confirming this, as it is so obvious to you.

>>1428967
To show humans are humans, and politicians politicians.

File: 1466744123557.jpg (93KB, 742x647px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 742x647px

>>1436403
yikes...........

File: 1453581755272.png (312KB, 673x919px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 673x919px

>>1436370
I have been so gullibe, I have been so blind!

File: score.png (15KB, 721x433px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 721x433px

>>1428947
Not bad.

That test is waaay biased though.

>>1430672
But Hess did go to Britain with peace terms. So its true you dip.
The test is undeniably biased, and there is bullshit in it (The germans bombed civillians first as far as I'm aware). But don't deny facts.

Its like every time "muh 6 gorillion" is brought up and people are just told to shut up and accept it. That number comes from a combination of estimates. The facts are it could be way off, but that doesn't mean the holocaust didn't happen and hitler dindu nuffin.
Trying to shut down the conversation only makes you look bad.

>>1436679
not him but didn't Hess go on his own? Hitler didn't send him. It's true Hitler would've preferred to end the war with Britain but he didn't send Hess.

>>1436316
No kidding.

The word is "Wehraboo".

>>1432979
>http://hitlerorchurchill.info/
Mosley Churchill De Grelle Mussolnini
Thats all i Know.

>>1429994
he killed a lot of germans and non-germans alike through the war. a lifetime of making the right decisions and restoring germany doesn't make up for destroying it all in the end

Got a little /pol/ at the end there. 88%, but most of the ones I didn't know were easy to guess.

>>1436419
en svensk tiger
(thank you duolingo)

I find it hilarious that people refuse to see Hitler as a human being. Whether its propaganda or self-defense mechanism against the perceived evilness image of Hitler thats being spread.


Protip: Hitler is human. He had human emotions, dreams, family, feelings, etc. He was 100% guaranteed human.

>B-but he hated Jews
PRO-FUCKING-TIP All the white people of the time, and by "all the white people" I mean "ALL THE WHITE PEOPLE", hated Jews.

>B-but Jews are white
Not back then. Jews were a hated almost as much as Blacks.

>B-but Hitler hated Jews more
Nope. He's well in line with COMMON/AVERAGE/EVERYDAY PEOPLE'S
anti-Jewish beliefs of Europe/America/Australia/etc.

>B-but Hitler killed people in WWII
So did Churchill, Hirohito, Roosevelt, Stalin, Mao, etc

All of them ordered their men to kill people.


>B-but NAZI is EVIL
Sorry, NAZI is just a name. "EVIL" is simply a term for enemy.
>Y-you're a HITLER apologist
NOPE. In fact, I agree with you when you say Hitler is EVIL. "WHAT?" Yes. Thats right. I will say however, Europeans of the time were evil as well.

>B-but muh culture and history
A lie. Historical world leaders of WWII are all bent on political power. Thus, they're all equally evil in a neutral presentist view.

89%

Churchill was a great man. It's a shame that his better policies (like eugenics, gassing darkies, and crushing curries) are now viewed negatively. People's values are all up-side down.

>>1438087
Hitler is a secular devil used in secular beliefs desu

>>1428947
LITERALLY Neo-Nazi propaga

File: countersignalmemeforflashygoys.png (14KB, 434x458px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 434x458px

>>1438149
>these facts can be used to support a point of view contrary to my own which means its propaganda so they're invalid
>i mean, you cant just spit out the truth if it goes against what i believe, thats wrong

>>1428947
Got 83

File: Screenshot_2016-07-20-11-59-02~2.png (90KB, 1021x473px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1021x473px

>>1428967
>What's the purpose of this?
"hitler dindu nuffin he a good boy trying to get the reich back on track"

>>1429086
>>1436333
>>1429137
you pointless dumb butthurt almost make me ashamed to be European, The Great Depression was worldwide event.

78%

Open your eyes burgers, you supported the wrong guy.

>>1440411
Hitler supported the wrong guy when he declared war on the US.

Some of these questions are absolute dogshit. The quality is variable as fuck.

>>1436272
M8 you can read up on all this stuff if you want but don't act like Churchill was a paragon of virtue

>>1428947
80%. It got real easy once i realized they were going all naziboo

Triggered leftards are heilarious

File: 2016-07-21 13_41_25-Hitler or Churchill.png (132KB, 1290x567px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1290x567px

>>1428947
gg no re

>>1442615
kek

File: heilarious.png (22KB, 738x356px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 738x356px

>>1442445
You know what else is heilarious?

>>1442644
>hitler saved the German economy!
>actually his reckless war spending caused the economy to overheat forcing him to either put his military to use or suffer a massive depression, and the only reason the economy didn't collapse anyways was the fixed prices and liberation of hundreds of thousands of tons of bullion and resources from all the countries he conquered

This kills the naziboo
If only we could kill the wehraboos too

File: 80percent.jpg (55KB, 1507x587px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1507x587px

Surprised I got this much, thought I made some really dumb choices.

Anyway, they both seemed to have been based in some contexts and horrible in others.