>tfw you realize there is no good or bad, just that which

It isn't a truth if you can't live it.

It doesn't really matter what you SAY is good or bad, it's how you feel after you've performed an action. If you suffer negative emotion after performing an action, it's safe to say that the action you preformed is bad.

>>1387595
Emotions are spooks

>>1387600

That may be the case, but if you can't live with your emotional spooks, you've done something bad.

>>1387610
You must live beyond your spooks
Become the übermensch

>>1387579
>Have I just finished philosophy?
Maybe: Can you back up your position?

>>1387595
>It isn't a truth if you can't live it
Truth never depends on humans.

Stirner already finished it. He was largely ignored and people kept on philosophizing anyway, which is the truest affirmation of his ideal I've ever seen.

>>1387600

>an aspect of my being, my self, is a spook

You literally do not know the definition of Spook. Spooks are anything which leads, which coerces, an individual away from and against himself. Your emotions are a dramatic part of what makes you You.

If you wish to be altruistic because you feel emotionally invested in the well-being of others and it brings you joy to help others then you are being true to yourself; This is not a Spook.

If you help others not because it's what you truly desire but because it is 'the right thing to do'; This is a Spook.

>>1387711

The truth of your experience says otherwise.

>>1387579
na, you just misunderstood a smidgen of 18th century philosophy.

>>1387960
Experiences can be right or wrong depending on how accurately they describe reality.
But maybe you meant that truths like "I'm experiencing 4chan" are clearly human dependant.
To which I say: yes, but only those kind.