Post stuff that triggers you >unironically using terms like

>>1321899
>communism has never been tried

>>1321899
>>categorizing historical events/persons as "good" and "evil"
What's wrong about that? There are reasonable working definitions of good and evil in society, why should they not apply to history?

>>1321917
protip: there aren't

>>1321899
Dark ages is easier than "early medieval period" even though it does carry unpleasant connotations.

Plus it was genuinely a fall from the superior classical world so :^))))))

>>1321932
>fall
>superior
Just a rough transition into a properly religious world.

File: 220px-JulianusII-antioch(360-363)-CNG.jpg (16KB, 220x225px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 220x225px

>>1321936
Hysterical jewish zealots not welcome.

>>1321899
Empires are evil.

File: Abdel-Fattah-al-Sisi.jpg (237KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 720x480px

>The Catholic Church was so meen and close minded :'(
>Muslims were always ebil expansionist fgts and Muhammad was a pedorapist satanist baby eating puppy kicking railroad tycoon who left the toilet seat up every night!
>Genghis Khan was literally S8tan incarnate senpai!
>Da Germans Started World War I AND II !
>Wow! Ninjas were so kewl!

Cancer.

>>1323676
Muhammad DIDN'T leave the toilet seat up every night? My entire worldview has been shattered.

Only knowing about The Assassins from Assassin's Creed.

>>1321917
because context is exceptionally important.