How does /his/ feel about Men At Arms books? A bunch of the

I like the concept, but you can't fit a whole lot of pictures or info into a 50 page book.

>>1275396
Their edition of the paraguayian war was pretty good.

>>1275396
Looking for the one about the byzantine empire during the Macedonians.

File: You Want Honorabor combat fuk u here torch.jpg (583KB, 1441x1026px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1441x1026px

>>1275396
Its pretty cool for the pictures but you can only trust shit Osprey writes in relation to 1700's to more recent years.

Beyond that shit is in suspect territory. Their Premodern Asian collection is particularly shit as it took fucking memes seriously (Chinese peasant armies, Ninjas, freely admitting they can't read firsthand Japanese/Chinese sources, etc.)

>>1275396
Butthurt Chinaboos will deny that better sources exist for China than Osprey, but always fail to deliver.

File: Osprey Ming.png (691KB, 380x723px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 380x723px

>>1276120
>《畫說中國歷代甲胄》
>《中國古代軍戎服飾》
>《中國古代實戰兵器圖鑑》

Just to name a few. Osprey is really hit or miss and much of their information is outdated.

/fa/ as fuck