ITT: Shit-tier philosophers I can't decide between

File: 1462987223235.png (764KB, 615x980px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 615x980px

>>1259555

t.assblasted Christcuck

Sam Harris

Thomas of Aquinas

>>1259591
dis

>>1259573
I'm an atheist.

>Hume is bad

Oh boy.. either he is a mad christian or a mad scientifically illiterate who thinks he is good at science -person

File: 1459107107722.gif (580KB, 200x187px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 200x187px

>>1259555
What's wrong with Hume?

>>1259724
Naw anon is right christcuck. Very unchristian of you to want him to die. The hypocrisy with some of you.. You sin while you're shilling out your value system, violating it at the sametime.

Spinoza

>>1259586
I'm not even sure how his wikipedia page lists him as a philosopher in the first place.

>>1260002
He studied philosophy. graduated, practices philosophy for living and makes money off of it.

He's a philosopher, whether your god disagrees with him or not. Alternatively, you could ask your god to smite him, and he'd be gone from your life.

>>1259555
Karl Popper, Ayn Rand

File: happydays.jpg (22KB, 236x301px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 236x301px

>>1259555
Camus.

Decent writer, shitty philosopher. I don't even know why he's called a philosopher.

>>1259771
I assumed anon was saying "this" in African American Vernacular English.

All philosophers are shit. Just get a real job instead of pondering what ifs?

Berkeley

>>1260624
Rock kicker detected

>>1260669
Someone who agrees with a shit-tier philosopher detected

>>1260624
Truly the worst. He should be jettisoned from the canon.

Everyone that disagrees with my worldview

>>1260149
Existentialism, mate. The only requisite needed to be a philosopher is to want to be one.

>>1260149
He didn't regard himself as much of a one. He just liked writing about things and hanged out with existentialists.

File: 1464823836628.png (672KB, 883x829px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 883x829px

>>1259741
t. assblasted commi

Aquinas is actually really overrated and I'm saying that as a Christian. Babby tier philosophy.

>>1259555

Aristotle,
Plato,
Parmenides,
Zeno,
Russell

>>1261036
Woo lad

>>1260149
Camus' philosophy may not have been the greatest but anyone who hates commies is alright in my book.

>>1259758
Stupid enough to think that there's a gap between "is" and "ought."

>>1261036
Ironic or not, literally the worst thing I have ever read

>>1260149
What's wrong with his philosophy? It's a pretty decent bare-bones approach to overcoming existential nihilism.

Probably Bertrand Russell. He is a large part of the reason why logical positivism spread so widely, and why it's impossible to argue with /sci/-fags because they just scream "muh empiricism".

>>1261341
This

>>1261341
can someone explain to me whats wrong with empiricism? I pretty much use it to problem solve all my thoughts and experiences, but I feel like a pleb.

>>1261469
not convincingly

>>1261475
actually i guess i use a combo of empiricism and rationality

>>1259771
Nietzschiepoo was right about these Christcucks. The religion is an expression of slave morality, regressive resentment and a desire to control though guilt and moral griping.

Verily it is the lamest, most colorless, most sexless and flavorless or all religions.

>>1260810
Stirner was a commie.

>>1261469
>I pretty much use it to problem solve all my thoughts and experiences,
I guess you don't do much math?

>>1261490
Math is empirical by nature. As is everything.

>>1261515
We've yet to prove that in any sense beyond the most immediate.

Muh theoretical physics

File: go.png (276KB, 353x379px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 353x379px

>>1261515
hilarious. There is nothing empirical about mathematics

>>1259555
>Hume
>Shit tier

This is bait right? If I had to choose one philosopher who couldn't conceivably be considered shit even if you disagree with everything he said, it would be Hume.

Can one of you who 'gets' stirner explain to me how a mother dying for her child (i.e. that mom in China who got swallowed by the escalator) is her being influenced by spooks or how it isn't if you think it isn't? Why does Stirner get to be the authority on what is coming from the 'creative nothing' (i.e. the mothers child-protecting instinct) and what is coming from some moral she feels obligated to live (and die in this case) for?
>>814220

>>1261076
Camus was a communist, he just wasn't a massive tankie like his mate Sartre.

>>1261326
That's exactly it, it's basically the tl;dr of existential nihilism. Whilst quite simple and easy to digest it's not anywhere near as philosophically thorough as the kind of philosophers he gets lumped in with.

>>1261807
The mother putting her childs intrests above herselfs is definetly a spook. Stirner explains the exact sitation in his book using a mother protecting her child as an example. Though the fact that its a spook doesent matter since you can follow spooks if they make you happy. Stirners stuff is mostly about being more honest with yourself than ridding yourself of all spooks. Spooks are fine if they make you happy and are useful. Just discard the ones that dont make you happy and the ones that harm you or change them so they serve you, not so you serve them.

>>1261488

>>1261341
He was a cuck. His father was a cuck.
I'm not even /pol/ but it disgusts me. Seriously what the fuck Berty and his father.

ITT: butthurt christfags being triggered by thinkers disagreeing with their special snowflake beliefs

>>1262775
*tips fedora*

>>1261469
Empiricism definitely has its uses (the scientific method being the principle one) but as a philosophical outlook it's fucking babby-tier.

It can provide us with no knowledge of things such as the nature of reality (not the nature of nature mind you), the capacity for knowledge, and hell most crucially what experience Tbh m RCN m even *is.*