>>My first course in philosophy was nothing less than a summary of the important systems of thought put forward in Western Europe during the last twenty-six hundred years. Perhaps that is a slight exaggeration--we did gloss over a few centuries in the Middle Ages. For the rest we touched upon all the historic names from Thales to Nietzsche. After about nine weeks of this bewildering transit a friend approached me with a sour look on his face. "You know," he said, "I can't make head or tail out of this business. I agree with each philosopher as we study him. But when we get to the next one, I agree with him too. Yet he generally says the other one was wrong. They can't all be right. Can they now?" I was too much puzzled with the same difficulty to help him.
They wouldn't be famous if what they said did not make sense.
Other than Rousseau and that Nietzsche cuck, that is.
>>1201952
Now you understand why Socrates hated sophistry so much
Now go find the truth and defend it
>>1201970
>They wouldn't be famous if what they said did not make sense.
>>1202056
Something making sense doesn't have to be right.
>>1201952
It's because your friend is an idiot who can't think for himself.