What do you think about solipcism? Is there any way to disprove

>>1181649
>Is there any way to disprove it?
Take it to its natural conclusion. Nondual Shiva Tantra.

File: shsyxgsus985.jpg (64KB, 637x369px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 637x369px

>>1181649
No

>>1181649
Disprove, no, but you can empirically test it. Walk in the middle of a busy highway with your eyes closed while listening to loud music. if you're only the real person nothing should happen to you.

>>1183015
That wouldn't disprove it. One could argue that you just crashed the simulation, and as far as you'd be concerned, that would be a viable explanation.

There's no way to disprove it but every time you argue for it you are doing a performative contradiction because arguing presupposes that you are communicating with another who you believe actually exists.